From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5484C43613 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4AA20665 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9C4AA20665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heMge-00035g-OB for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:46:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVW-0001qN-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVS-0001sn-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heMVM-0001Vl-4L; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:35:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0E585540; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kamzik.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.2.160]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7755E1001DE1; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Andrew Jones To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:34:16 +0200 Message-Id: <20190621163422.6127-9-drjones@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190621163422.6127-1-drjones@redhat.com> References: <20190621163422.6127-1-drjones@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 21 Jun 2019 16:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/14] target/arm/kvm64: Fix error returns X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" A couple return -EINVAL's forgot their '-'s. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Eric Auger --- target/arm/kvm64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c index 45ccda589903..9ca9a0ce821d 100644 --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level) write_cpustate_to_list(cpu, true); =20 if (!write_list_to_kvmstate(cpu, level)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } =20 kvm_arm_sync_mpstate_to_kvm(cpu); @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs) } =20 if (!write_kvmstate_to_list(cpu)) { - return EINVAL; + return -EINVAL; } /* Note that it's OK to have registers which aren't in CPUState, * so we can ignore a failure return here. --=20 2.20.1