From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Should configure --enable-debug add -Og to CFLAGS?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:02:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627160218.GO12358@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tvcbc9ul.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The fine manual advises:
>
> '-O0'
> Reduce compilation time and make debugging produce the expected
> results. This is the default.
> [...]
> '-Og'
> Optimize debugging experience. '-Og' should be the optimization
> level of choice for the standard edit-compile-debug cycle, offering
> a reasonable level of optimization while maintaining fast
> compilation and a good debugging experience. It is a better choice
> than '-O0' for producing debuggable code because some compiler
> passes that collect debug information are disabled at '-O0'.
>
> Our configure --enable-debug effectively picks -O0. Should it pick -Og
> instead?
NB, it is the --enable-debug-info option to configure that actually
adds the "-g" flag for debug info in objects, and turns off -O2.
--enable-debug turns on TCG and Mutex debugging & disables fortify
source, but doesn't affect optimization level.
Adding -Og to --enable-debug-info would be problematic for Fedora/RHEL
distro builds, as we want debugging symbols, but also still want -O2
to be used.
Yes, the naming of these options is a trapdoor over a pit of crocodiles :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-27 15:43 [Qemu-devel] Should configure --enable-debug add -Og to CFLAGS? Markus Armbruster
2019-06-27 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-27 16:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-27 16:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627160218.GO12358@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).