qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Should configure --enable-debug add -Og to CFLAGS?
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:02:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627160218.GO12358@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tvcbc9ul.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The fine manual advises:
> 
> '-O0'
>      Reduce compilation time and make debugging produce the expected
>      results.  This is the default.
> [...]
> '-Og'
>      Optimize debugging experience.  '-Og' should be the optimization
>      level of choice for the standard edit-compile-debug cycle, offering
>      a reasonable level of optimization while maintaining fast
>      compilation and a good debugging experience.  It is a better choice
>      than '-O0' for producing debuggable code because some compiler
>      passes that collect debug information are disabled at '-O0'.
> 
> Our configure --enable-debug effectively picks -O0.  Should it pick -Og
> instead?

NB, it is the --enable-debug-info option to configure that actually
adds the "-g" flag for debug info in objects, and turns off -O2.

--enable-debug turns on TCG and Mutex debugging & disables fortify
source, but doesn't affect optimization level.

Adding -Og to --enable-debug-info would be problematic for Fedora/RHEL
distro builds, as we want debugging symbols, but also still want -O2
to be used.

Yes, the naming of these options is a trapdoor over a pit of crocodiles :-)

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27 15:43 [Qemu-devel] Should configure --enable-debug add -Og to CFLAGS? Markus Armbruster
2019-06-27 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-27 16:45   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-27 16:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190627160218.GO12358@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).