qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.2] xics/kvm: Convert assert() to error_setg()
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:12:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704101204.4968e0a1@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704002357.GR9442@umbus.fritz.box>

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:23:57 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:50:12PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > ics_set_kvm_state_one() is called either during reset, in which case
> > both 'saved priority' and 'current priority' are equal to 0xff, or
> > during migration. In the latter case, 'saved priority' may differ
> > from 'current priority' only if the interrupt had been masked with
> > the ibm,int-off RTAS call. Instead of aborting QEMU, print out an
> > error and exit.
> 
> What's the rationale for this?  Doesn't hitting this indicate an error
> in the qemu code, for which an abort is the usual response?
> 

This error can be hit by the destination during migration if the
incoming stream is corrupted. Aborting in this case would mislead
the user into suspecting a bug in the destination QEMU, which isn't
the case.

Appart from that, when the in-kernel XICS is in use, only two functions
manipulate the ICS state: ics_set_kvm_state_one() and ics_get_kvm_state().
The code is trivial enough that I don't see a great value in the assert
in the first place... BTW, it comes from the commit:

commit 11ad93f68195f68cc94d988f2aa50b4d190ee52a
Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Date:   Thu Sep 26 16:18:44 2013 +1000

    xics-kvm: Support for in-kernel XICS interrupt controller

Maybe you remember some context that justified the assert at the time ?

> > 
> > Based-on: <156217454083.559957.7359208229523652842.stgit@bahia.lan>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > This isn't a bugfix, hence targetting 4.2, but it depends on an actual
> > fix for 4.1, as mentionned in the Based-on tag.
> > ---
> >  hw/intc/xics_kvm.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c b/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> > index 2df1f3e92c7e..f8758b928250 100644
> > --- a/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> > +++ b/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> > @@ -255,8 +255,21 @@ int ics_set_kvm_state_one(ICSState *ics, int srcno, Error **errp)
> >      state = irq->server;
> >      state |= (uint64_t)(irq->saved_priority & KVM_XICS_PRIORITY_MASK)
> >          << KVM_XICS_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
> > -    if (irq->priority != irq->saved_priority) {
> > -        assert(irq->priority == 0xff);
> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * An interrupt can be masked either because the ICS is resetting, in
> > +     * which case we expect 'current priority' and 'saved priority' to be
> > +     * equal to 0xff, or because the guest has called the ibm,int-off RTAS
> > +     * call, in which case we we have recorded the priority the interrupt
> > +     * had before it was masked in 'saved priority'. If the interrupt isn't
> > +     * masked, 'saved priority' and 'current priority' are equal (see
> > +     * ics_get_kvm_state()). Make sure we restore a sane state, otherwise
> > +     * fail migration.
> > +     */
> > +    if (irq->priority != irq->saved_priority && irq->priority != 0xff) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Corrupted state detected for interrupt source %d",
> > +                   srcno);
> > +        return -EINVAL;
> >      }
> >  
> >      if (irq->priority == 0xff) {
> > 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-03 17:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.2] xics/kvm: Convert assert() to error_setg() Greg Kurz
2019-07-03 23:30 ` no-reply
2019-07-04  0:23 ` David Gibson
2019-07-04  8:12   ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2019-07-05  4:56     ` David Gibson
2019-07-05 13:40       ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190704101204.4968e0a1@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).