From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, John Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 0/1] Don't obey the kernel block device max transfer len / max segments for raw block devices
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:31:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190711103120.GF13422@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704124342.7753-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3273 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 03:43:41PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Linux block devices, even in O_DIRECT mode don't have any user visible
> limit on transfer size / number of segments, which underlying kernel block device can have.
> The kernel block layer takes care of enforcing these limits by splitting the bios.
>
> By limiting the transfer sizes, we force qemu to do the splitting itself which
> introduces various overheads.
> It is especially visible in nbd server, where the low max transfer size of the
> underlying device forces us to advertise this over NBD, thus increasing the
> traffic overhead in case of image conversion which benefits from large blocks.
>
> More information can be found here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647104
>
> Tested this with qemu-img convert over nbd and natively and to my surprise,
> even native IO performance improved a bit.
>
> (The device on which it was tested is Intel Optane DC P4800X,
> which has 128k max transfer size reported by the kernel)
>
> The benchmark:
>
> Images were created using:
>
> Sparse image: qemu-img create -f qcow2 /dev/nvme0n1p3 1G / 10G / 100G
> Allocated image: qemu-img create -f qcow2 /dev/nvme0n1p3 -o preallocation=metadata 1G / 10G / 100G
>
> The test was:
>
> echo "convert native:"
> rm -rf /dev/shm/disk.img
> time qemu-img convert -p -f qcow2 -O raw -T none $FILE /dev/shm/disk.img > /dev/zero
>
> echo "convert via nbd:"
> qemu-nbd -k /tmp/nbd.sock -v -f qcow2 $FILE -x export --cache=none --aio=native --fork
> rm -rf /dev/shm/disk.img
> time qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw nbd:unix:/tmp/nbd.sock:exportname=export /dev/shm/disk.img > /dev/zero
>
> The results:
>
> =========================================
> 1G sparse image:
> native:
> before: 0.027s
> after: 0.027s
> nbd:
> before: 0.287s
> after: 0.035s
>
> =========================================
> 100G sparse image:
> native:
> before: 0.028s
> after: 0.028s
> nbd:
> before: 23.796s
> after: 0.109s
>
> =========================================
> 1G preallocated image:
> native:
> before: 0.454s
> after: 0.427s
> nbd:
> before: 0.649s
> after: 0.546s
>
> The block limits of max transfer size/max segment size are retained
> for the SCSI passthrough because in this case the kernel passes the userspace request
> directly to the kernel scsi driver, bypassing the block layer, and thus there is no code to split
> such requests.
>
> Fam, since you was the original author of the code that added
> these limits, could you share your opinion on that?
> What was the reason besides SCSI passthrough?
>
> V2:
>
> * Manually tested to not break the scsi passthrough with a nested VM
> * As Eric suggested, refactored the area around the fstat.
> * Spelling/grammar fixes
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
> Maxim Levitsky (1):
> raw-posix.c - use max transfer length / max segement count only for
> SCSI passthrough
>
> block/file-posix.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.2
>
>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-04 12:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Don't obey the kernel block device max transfer len / max segments for raw block devices Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-04 12:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] raw-posix.c - use max transfer length / max segement count only for SCSI passthrough Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-10 13:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-07-11 10:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-07-12 8:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Don't obey the kernel block device max transfer len / max segments for raw block devices Pankaj Gupta
2019-07-12 9:20 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190711103120.GF13422@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jferlan@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).