From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB57C76188 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726492173B for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:04:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 726492173B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hnN8I-0001oP-QN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:04:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hnN89-0001PT-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:04:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hnN88-0007Jg-Ob for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:04:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hnN88-0007H9-JN; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:04:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6648553A; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-117-180.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.180]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9F71001DC2; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:04:19 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Ilya Leoshkevich Message-ID: <20190716150419.6452ab9c.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20598EE9-577B-4C96-A106-4CFA2DB5D914@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190716123446.24039-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> <20598EE9-577B-4C96-A106-4CFA2DB5D914@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:04:27 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390: support EDAT-2 in mmu_translate_region X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:52:03 +0200 Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > Am 16.07.2019 um 14:41 schrieb David Hildenbrand : > >=20 > > How urgent is this? If this can wait, I can polish and send my series I= have here > > instead, which also implents > > - IEP support > > - access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility > > - ESOP-1, ESOP-2 =20 >=20 > This is not urgent, I can live with my patch for now. > It=E2=80=99s good to know that proper EDAT-2 support is being worked on. >=20 > Thanks! > Ilya Ok, so I will not queue this patch right now (I assume you're fine with keeping this locally for now?), but wait for David's series for 4.2. Sounds reasonable?