From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] block: Delay poll when ending drained sections
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:37:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190716163746.GH7297@linux.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82ce3044-e228-2453-5da2-9f86e4627066@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4025 bytes --]
Am 16.07.2019 um 18:24 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 16.07.19 16:40, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 19.06.2019 um 17:25 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This is v2 to “block: Keep track of parent quiescing”.
> >>
> >> Please read this cover letter, because I’m very unsure about the design
> >> in this series and I’d appreciate some comments.
> >>
> >> As Kevin wrote in his reply to that series, the actual problem is that
> >> bdrv_drain_invoke() polls on every node whenever ending a drain. This
> >> may cause graph changes, which is actually forbidden.
> >>
> >> To solve that problem, this series makes the drain code construct a list
> >> of undrain operations that have been initiated, and then polls all of
> >> them on the root level once graph changes are acceptable.
> >>
> >> Note that I don’t like this list concept very much, so I’m open to
> >> alternatives.
> >
> > So drain_end is different from drain_begin in that it wants to wait only
> > for all bdrv_drain_invoke() calls to complete, but not for other
> > requests that are in flight. Makes sense.
> >
> > Though instead of managing a whole list, wouldn't a counter suffice?
> >
> >> Furthermore, all BdrvChildRoles with BDS parents have a broken
> >> .drained_end() implementation. The documentation clearly states that
> >> this function is not allowed to poll, but it does. So this series
> >> changes it to a variant (using the new code) that does not poll.
> >>
> >> There is a catch, which may actually be a problem, I don’t know: The new
> >> variant of that .drained_end() does not poll at all, never. As
> >> described above, now every bdrv_drain_invoke() returns an object that
> >> describes when it will be done and which can thus be polled for. These
> >> objects are just discarded when using BdrvChildRole.drained_end(). That
> >> does not feel quite right. It would probably be more correct to let
> >> BdrvChildRole.drained_end() return these objects so the top level
> >> bdrv_drained_end() can poll for their completion.
> >>
> >> I decided not to do this, for two reasons:
> >> (1) Doing so would spill the “list of objects to poll for” design to
> >> places outside of block/io.c. I don’t like the design very much as
> >> it is, but I can live with it as long as it’s constrained to the
> >> core drain code in block/io.c.
> >> This is made worse by the fact that currently, those objects are of
> >> type BdrvCoDrainData. But it shouldn’t be a problem to add a new
> >> type that is externally visible (we only need the AioContext and
> >> whether bdrv_drain_invoke_entry() is done).
> >>
> >> (2) It seems to work as it is.
> >>
> >> The alternative would be to add the same GSList ** parameter to
> >> BdrvChildRole.drained_end() that I added in the core drain code in patch
> >> 2, and then let the .drained_end() implementation fill that with objects
> >> to poll for. (Which would be accomplished by adding a frontend to
> >> bdrv_do_drained_end() that lets bdrv_child_cb_drained_poll() pass the
> >> parameter through.)
> >>
> >> Opinions?
> >
> > I think I would add an int* to BdrvChildRole.drained_end() so that we
> > can just increase the counter whereever we need to.
>
> So you mean just polling the @bs for which a caller gave poll=true until
> the counter reaches 0? I’ll try, sounds good (if I can get it to work).
Yes, that's what I have in mind.
We expect graph changes to happen during the polling, but I think the
caller is responsible for making sure that the top-level @bs stays
around, so we don't need to be extra careful here.
Also, bdrv_drain_invoke() is always called in the same AioContext as the
top-level drain operation, so the whole aio_context_acquire/release
stuff from this series should become unnecessary, and we don't need
atomics to access the counter either.
So I think this should really simplify the series a lot.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-16 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 15:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] block: Delay poll when ending drained sections Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/9] block: Introduce BdrvChild.parent_quiesce_counter Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/9] block: Add @data_objs to bdrv_drain_invoke() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/9] block: Add bdrv_poll_drain_data_objs() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/9] block: Move polling out of bdrv_drain_invoke() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] block: Add @poll to bdrv_parent_drained_end_single() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/9] block: Add bdrv_drained_end_no_poll() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/9] block: Fix BDS children's .drained_end() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/9] iotests: Add @has_quit to vm.shutdown() Max Reitz
2019-06-19 15:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 9/9] iotests: Test commit with a filter on the chain Max Reitz
2019-07-15 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/9] block: Delay poll when ending drained sections Max Reitz
2019-07-16 14:40 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-16 16:24 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-16 16:37 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-07-17 13:20 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190716163746.GH7297@linux.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).