From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr: Stop providing RTAS blob
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:22:51 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719022251.GP8468@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b727864-1634-0a5d-c557-fcaa52c49434@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1369 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:20:56AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/07/2019 07.35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
> > image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
> > anyway as the guest OS always decides where to put it.
> >
> > This totally depends on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1132440/ ,
> > hence RFC.
>
> Patch looks basically fine for me, but I wonder whether we should wait
> for one or two releases until we really remove it from QEMU, so that it
> is still possible to test the latest QEMU with older SLOF releases for a
> while (which is sometimes useful when hunting bugs). Or should this
> maybe even go through the official deprecation process (i.e. with an
> entry in qemu-deprecated.texi)?
I don't really like this idea. It blocks some cleanups I'd like to do
which rely on it being truly gone, not just sometimes-gone.
I think it's reasonable to do this, since the "raw" rtas blob from
qemu was never supposed to be a guest visible artifact - any guest
that was relying on this was going out of its way to be fragile.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-19 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-16 5:35 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH qemu] spapr: Stop providing RTAS blob Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-16 5:39 ` no-reply
2019-07-18 7:20 ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-18 7:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-18 10:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2019-07-18 10:49 ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-19 1:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-19 8:08 ` Thomas Huth
2019-07-19 2:22 ` David Gibson [this message]
2019-07-22 5:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190719022251.GP8468@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).