From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
den@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] mirror: Keep target drained until graph changes are done
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:36:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190726113653.GC6295@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6466e56-b57b-7cf7-1a39-8cd38db14ede@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4001 bytes --]
Am 26.07.2019 um 11:52 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 25.07.19 18:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Calling bdrv_drained_end() for target_bs can restarts requests too
> > early, so that they would execute on mirror_top_bs, which however has
> > already dropped all permissions.
> >
> > Keep the target node drained until all graph changes have completed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/mirror.c | 14 ++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
> > index 8cb75fb409..7483051f8d 100644
> > --- a/block/mirror.c
> > +++ b/block/mirror.c
> > @@ -644,6 +644,11 @@ static int mirror_exit_common(Job *job)
> > bdrv_ref(mirror_top_bs);
> > bdrv_ref(target_bs);
> >
> > + /* The mirror job has no requests in flight any more, but we need to
> > + * drain potential other users of the BDS before changing the graph. */
> > + assert(s->in_drain);
> > + bdrv_drained_begin(target_bs);
> > +
>
> In contrast to what Eric said, I think it is a problem that this is just
> code motion.
>
> The comment doesn’t tell the reason why the target needs to be drained
> here. Other users of the BDS have their own BdrvChild and thus their
> own permissions, their requests do not go through mirror.
>
> So in addition to why the target needs to be drained around
> bdrv_replace_node(), the comment should tell why we need to drain it
> here, like the commit message does.
>
> Now, the thing is, I don’t quite understand the connection between the
> target and mirror_top_bs that the commit message wants to establish.
>
> I see the following problem:
> (1) We drain src (at the end of mirror_run()).
> (2) This implicitly drains mirror_top_bs.
> (3) We drain target.
> (4) bdrv_replace_node() replaces src by target, thus replacing the drain
> on mirror_top_bs from src by the one from target.
> (5) We undrain target, thus also undraining mirror_top_bs.
(5.5) Remove mirror_top_bs from the target chain
> (6) After all is done, we undrain src, which has no effect on
> mirror_top_bs, because they haven’t been connected since (4).
>
> I suppose (5) is the problem. This patch moves it down to (6), so
> mirror_top_bs is drained as long as src is drained.
The problem is that (5) happens before (5.5), so we can start requests
on a node that we're about to remove (without draining it again before).
> (If to_replace is not src, then src will stay attached, which keeps
> mirror_top_bs drained, too.)
>
> This makes it seem to me like the actually important thing is to drain
> mirror_top_bs, not target. If so, it would seem more obvious to me to
> just add a drain on mirror_top_bs than to move the existing target drain.
Do you really think having a third drained section makes things easier
to understand? Draining both source and target while we're modifying the
graph seems pretty intuitive to me - which is also why I moved the
bdrv_drained_begin() to the very start instead of looking for the first
operation that actually strictly needs it.
> > /* Remove target parent that still uses BLK_PERM_WRITE/RESIZE before
> > * inserting target_bs at s->to_replace, where we might not be able to get
> > * these permissions.
> > @@ -684,12 +689,7 @@ static int mirror_exit_common(Job *job)
> > bdrv_reopen_set_read_only(target_bs, ro, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > - /* The mirror job has no requests in flight any more, but we need to
> > - * drain potential other users of the BDS before changing the graph. */
> > - assert(s->in_drain);
> > - bdrv_drained_begin(target_bs);
>
> By the way, don’t we need to drain to_replace also? In case it isn’t src?
I think to_replace is required to be in the subtree of src, no?
Though maybe it could have another parent, so you might be right.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] block-backend: Queue requests while drained Kevin Wolf
2019-07-25 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: Remove blk_pread_unthrottled() Kevin Wolf
2019-07-26 9:18 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-25 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: Reduce (un)drains when replacing a child Kevin Wolf
2019-07-25 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] mirror: Keep target drained until graph changes are done Kevin Wolf
2019-07-25 17:03 ` Eric Blake
2019-07-26 9:52 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-26 11:36 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-07-26 12:30 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-25 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] block-backend: Queue requests while drained Kevin Wolf
2019-07-25 17:06 ` Eric Blake
2019-07-26 10:50 ` Max Reitz
2019-07-26 11:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-07-26 12:34 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190726113653.GC6295@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).