From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:30:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190729103056.42f423ff@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <690fd825-3553-6dee-5ff4-2ad7652afe46@redhat.com>
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:49:37 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28.07.19 15:13, Wei Yang wrote:
> > The memory-device list built by memory_device_build_list is ordered by
> > its address, this means if the tmp range exceed the hinted range, all
> > the following range will not overlap with it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/mem/memory-device.c b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> > index 413b514586..aea47ab3e8 100644
> > --- a/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> > +++ b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms,
> > range_make_empty(&new);
> > break;
> > }
> > - } else if (!hint) {
> > + } else if (!hint || range_lob(&tmp) > range_upb(&new)) {
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> Lower bound is inclusive, upper bound is exclusive. Shouldn't this be
>
> range_lob(&tmp) >= range_upb(&new)
>
> Also, I wonder if patch #2 is now really needed?
Indeed, it looks like 3/3 will break early in both hinted and
non-hinted cases so 2/3 looks not necessary (in case 2/3 is dropped
this commit message needs to be amended).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-28 13:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] memory-device: refine memory_device_get_free_addr Wei Yang
2019-07-28 13:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check Wei Yang
2019-07-29 6:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-07-29 7:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-28 13:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] memory-device: break the loop if no hint is provided Wei Yang
2019-07-29 7:04 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-07-29 7:49 ` Wei Yang
2019-07-29 7:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-29 7:50 ` Wei Yang
2019-07-28 13:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range Wei Yang
2019-07-29 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-29 7:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-29 8:30 ` Wei Yang
2019-07-29 8:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-07-29 8:30 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-07-29 12:56 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190729103056.42f423ff@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).