From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] require newer glib2 to enable autofree'ing of stack variables exiting scope
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:10:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731141055.GI12463@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a7cui9le.fsf@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Both GCC and CLang support a C extension attribute((cleanup)) which
> > allows you to define a function that is invoked when a stack variable
> > exits scope. This typically used to free the memory allocated to it,
> > though you're not restricted to this. For example it could be used to
> > unlock a mutex.
> <snip>
> >
> > GOOD:
> > g_autofree char *wibble = g_strdup("wibble")
> > ...
> > return g_steal_pointer(wibble);
> >
> > g_steal_pointer is an inline function which simply copies
> > the pointer to a new variable, and sets the original variable
> > to NULL, thus avoiding cleanup.
>
> Surely this is a particular use case where you wouldn't use g_autofree
> to declare the variable as you intending to return it to the outer scope?
I think it depends on the situation. Obviously real code will have
something in the "..." part I snipped.
You have 20 code paths that can result in returning with an error, where
you want to have all variables freed, and only 1 code path for success
Then it makes sense to use g_autofree + g_steal_pointer to eliminate
many goto jumps.
If you have only 1 error path and 1 success path, then a traditional
g_free() call is may well be sufficient.
IOW, as with many coding "rules", there's scope to use personal
judgement as to when it is right to ignore it vs folow it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 8:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] require newer glib2 to enable autofree'ing of stack variables exiting scope Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-07-25 8:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] glib: bump min required glib library version to 2.48 Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-07-25 8:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto: define cleanup functions for use with g_autoptr Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-07-25 8:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: use auto cleanup for many stack variables Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-07-29 14:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-07-31 12:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] require newer glib2 to enable autofree'ing of stack variables exiting scope Marc-André Lureau
2019-07-31 14:04 ` Alex Bennée
2019-07-31 14:08 ` Eric Blake
2019-07-31 14:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-07-31 14:33 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190731141055.GI12463@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).