From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] numa: add auto_enable_numa to fix broken check in spapr
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:58:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190805025844.GA29381@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27846884-9bf4-7729-7a9e-0392280ee67f@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4943 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 08:56:40AM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
> On 8/2/2019 2:55 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
> > > Introduce MachineClass::auto_enable_numa for one implicit NUMA node,
> > > and enable it to fix broken check in spapr_validate_node_memory(), when
> > > spapr_populate_memory() creates a implicit node and info then use
> > > nb_numa_nodes which is 0.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
> >
> > The change here looks fine so,
> >
> > Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> >
> > However, I'm not following what check in spapr is broken and why.
> >
> Sorry, may be I should update the commit message.
>
> Because in spapr_populate_memory(), if numa node is 0
>
> if (!nb_nodes) {
> nb_nodes = 1;
> ramnode.node_mem = machine->ram_size;
> nodes = &ramnode;
> }
>
> it use a local 'nb_nodes' as 1 and update global nodes info, but
> inpapr_validate_node_memory(), use the global nb_numa_nodes
>
> for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
> if (numa_info[i].node_mem % SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE) {
>
> so the global is 0 and skip the node_mem check.
Well, not really. That loop is that each node has memory size a
multiple of 256MiB. But we've already checked that the whole memory
size is a multiple of 256MiB, so in the case of one NUMA node, the
per-node check doesn't actually do anything extra.
And in the "non-NUMA" case, nb_numa_nodes == 0, then I don't believe
numa_info[] is populated anyway, so we couldn't do the check like
this.
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This patch has a dependency on
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11063235/
> > > ---
> > > hw/core/numa.c | 9 +++++++--
> > > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 9 +--------
> > > include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
> > > index 75db35ac19..756d243d3f 100644
> > > --- a/hw/core/numa.c
> > > +++ b/hw/core/numa.c
> > > @@ -580,9 +580,14 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms)
> > > * guest tries to use it with that drivers.
> > > *
> > > * Enable NUMA implicitly by adding a new NUMA node automatically.
> > > + *
> > > + * Or if MachineClass::auto_enable_numa is true and no NUMA nodes,
> > > + * assume there is just one node with whole RAM.
> > > */
> > > - if (ms->ram_slots > 0 && ms->numa_state->num_nodes == 0 &&
> > > - mc->auto_enable_numa_with_memhp) {
> > > + if (ms->numa_state->num_nodes == 0 &&
> > > + ((ms->ram_slots > 0 &&
> > > + mc->auto_enable_numa_with_memhp) ||
> > > + mc->auto_enable_numa)) {
> > > NumaNodeOptions node = { };
> > > parse_numa_node(ms, &node, &error_abort);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > index f607ca567b..e50343f326 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > @@ -400,14 +400,6 @@ static int spapr_populate_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt)
> > > hwaddr mem_start, node_size;
> > > int i, nb_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
> > > NodeInfo *nodes = machine->numa_state->nodes;
> > > - NodeInfo ramnode;
> > > -
> > > - /* No NUMA nodes, assume there is just one node with whole RAM */
> > > - if (!nb_nodes) {
> > > - nb_nodes = 1;
> > > - ramnode.node_mem = machine->ram_size;
> > > - nodes = &ramnode;
> > > - }
> > > for (i = 0, mem_start = 0; i < nb_nodes; ++i) {
> > > if (!nodes[i].node_mem) {
> > > @@ -4369,6 +4361,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > > */
> > > mc->numa_mem_align_shift = 28;
> > > mc->numa_mem_supported = true;
> > > + mc->auto_enable_numa = true;
> > > smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_HTM] = SPAPR_CAP_OFF;
> > > smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_VSX] = SPAPR_CAP_ON;
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> > > index 2eb9a0b4e0..4a350b87d2 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> > > @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
> > > bool smbus_no_migration_support;
> > > bool nvdimm_supported;
> > > bool numa_mem_supported;
> > > + bool auto_enable_numa;
> > > HotplugHandler *(*get_hotplug_handler)(MachineState *machine,
> > > DeviceState *dev);
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-05 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-01 7:52 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] numa: add auto_enable_numa to fix broken check in spapr Tao Xu
2019-08-02 6:55 ` David Gibson
2019-08-05 0:56 ` Tao Xu
2019-08-05 2:58 ` David Gibson [this message]
2019-08-05 3:37 ` Tao Xu
2019-08-05 6:40 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190805025844.GA29381@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=tao3.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).