From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BB7C0650F for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1EF620B1F for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:58:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E1EF620B1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huiBk-0002Tb-7M for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:58:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huiBI-000251-N9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:58:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huiBH-0001hy-LW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:58:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huiBH-0001hc-Bg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 14:58:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB09712BD; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (ovpn-117-168.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.168]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB50362926; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 19:57:51 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20190805185751.GB17658@work-vm> References: <20190801165409.20121-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20190801165409.20121-4-stefanha@redhat.com> <20190805151708.GN13734@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190805151708.GN13734@work-vm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:58:02 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] virtiofsd: fix lo_destroy() resource leaks X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, Liu Bo , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * Dr. David Alan Gilbert (dgilbert@redhat.com) wrote: > * Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@redhat.com) wrote: > > Now that lo_destroy() is serialized we can call unref_inode() so that > > all inode resources are freed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert > > > --- > > contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 43 ++++++++++++++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > > index a81c01d0d1..02a5e97326 100644 > > --- a/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > > +++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > > @@ -1340,28 +1340,6 @@ static void unref_inode(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode, uint64_t n) > > } > > } > > > > -static int unref_all_inodes_cb(gpointer key, gpointer value, > > - gpointer user_data) > > -{ > > - struct lo_inode *inode = value; > > - struct lo_data *lo = user_data; > > - > > - inode->nlookup = 0; > > - lo_map_remove(&lo->ino_map, inode->fuse_ino); > > - close(inode->fd); > > - lo_inode_put(lo, &inode); /* Drop our refcount from lo_do_lookup() */ > > - > > - return TRUE; > > -} > > - > > -static void unref_all_inodes(struct lo_data *lo) > > -{ > > - pthread_mutex_lock(&lo->mutex); > > - g_hash_table_foreach_remove(lo->inodes, unref_all_inodes_cb, lo); > > - pthread_mutex_unlock(&lo->mutex); > > - > > -} > > - > > static void lo_forget_one(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, uint64_t nlookup) > > { > > struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req); > > @@ -2462,6 +2440,18 @@ static void lo_removemapping(fuse_req_t req, struct fuse_session *se, > > fuse_reply_err(req, ret); > > } > > > > +static int destroy_inode_cb(gpointer key, gpointer value, gpointer user_data) > > +{ > > + struct lo_inode *inode = value; > > + struct lo_data *lo = user_data; > > + > > + /* inode->nlookup is normally protected by lo->mutex but see the > > + * comment in lo_destroy(). > > + */ > > + unref_inode(lo, inode, inode->nlookup); > > + return TRUE; > > +} > > + > > static void lo_destroy(void *userdata, struct fuse_session *se) > > { > > struct lo_data *lo = (struct lo_data*) userdata; > > @@ -2475,7 +2465,14 @@ static void lo_destroy(void *userdata, struct fuse_session *se) > > fuse_err("%s: unmap during destroy failed\n", __func__); > > } > > } > > - unref_all_inodes(lo); > > + > > + /* Normally lo->mutex must be taken when traversing lo->inodes but > > + * lo_destroy() is a serialized request so no races are possible here. > > + * > > + * In addition, we cannot acquire lo->mutex since destroy_inode_cb() takes it > > + * too and this would result in a recursive lock. > > + */ > > + g_hash_table_foreach_remove(lo->inodes, destroy_inode_cb, lo); I'm seeing a crash here if I ctrl-c the virtiofsd after it's got an active mount: (process:3219): GLib-CRITICAL **: 18:42:08.334: g_hash_table_foreach_remove_or_steal: assertion 'version == hash_table->version' failed (I only get the debug if I give seccomp both getpeername and ioctl; I think glib is trying to get to syslog and wants getpeername and I'm guessing ioctl to do something funky with the terminal). Dave > > } > > > > static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops lo_oper = { > > -- > > 2.21.0 > > > -- > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK