From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31CCC32751 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 02:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8778E217F4 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 02:03:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8778E217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvXm7-0002d3-S8 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:03:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvXla-0002EC-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:02:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvXlZ-0004Cr-0n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:02:58 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:43226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvXlY-0004CH-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:02:56 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2019 19:02:55 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,358,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="326161993" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2019 19:02:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 10:02:31 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20190808020231.GA26938@richard> References: <20190805053146.32326-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20190807183534.GN27871@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190807183534.GN27871@work-vm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.55.52.120 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] migration/postcopy: use mis->bh instead of allocating a QEMUBH X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: quintela@redhat.com, Wei Yang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:35:34PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >* Wei Yang (richardw.yang@linux.intel.com) wrote: >> For migration incoming side, it either quit in precopy or postcopy. It >> is safe to use the mis->bh for both instead of allocating a dedicated >> QEMUBH for postcopy. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert > >Hi Wei, > Can you check this, the patchew tests came back with a failure which >seems bh related; I've not tried it, but can you just see if you can >reproduce it? > I tried make check, which looks good. (Some other upstream commit introduced error. I revert them to make check work) >Dave > -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me