qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Prasad J Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] display/bochs: fix pcie support (qemu security issue)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:48:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812094814.24ad5c80@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-PxgCZzMJu8favVEP3x+DX3208TfChsu17fYCkibGg2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:38:05 +0100
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 16:35, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Quoting new commit log:
> >
> >         This makes sure the pci config space allocation is big enough,
> >         so accessing the PCIe extended config space doesn't overflow
> >         the pci config space buffer.
> >
> >         PCI(e) config space is guest writable.  Writes are limited
> >         bywrite mask (which probably is also filled with random stuff),
> >         so the guest can only flip enabled bits.  But I suspect it
> >         still might be exploitable, so rather serious because it might
> >         be a host escape for the guest.  On the other hand the device
> >         is probably not yet in widespread use.
> >
> >         Mitigation: use "-device bochs-display" as conventional pci
> >         device only.
> >
> > Is it clear to others that this mitigation remark seems to be
> > referencing an alternative configuration constraint to avoid the issue
> > rather than what's actually implemented in this patch?  IOW, if we
> > never place the bochs-display device into a PCIe hierarchy, then
> > extended config space is never accessible to the guest anyway, and
> > there is no issue.  I think this was meant to be an alternative to the
> > patch but the enforcement of that would happen above QEMU, probably why
> > it was mentioned in the cover letter rather than the original commit
> > log.  Thanks,  
> 
> Yeah, that's unclear in retrospect. How about:
> 
> # (For a QEMU version without this commit, a mitigation for the
> # bug is available: use "-device bochs-display" as a conventional pci
> # device only.)

Yes, better.  Thanks,

Alex


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-12  6:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] display/bochs: fix pcie support (qemu security issue) Gerd Hoffmann
2019-08-12  6:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] display/bochs: fix pcie support Gerd Hoffmann
2019-08-12 12:59   ` Alex Williamson
2019-08-12 12:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] display/bochs: fix pcie support (qemu security issue) Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-12 12:51   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-12 13:39     ` Peter Maydell
2019-08-12 14:15       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-12 15:35       ` Alex Williamson
2019-08-12 15:38         ` Peter Maydell
2019-08-12 15:48           ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2019-08-12 16:34             ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190812094814.24ad5c80@x1.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).