qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex <coderain@sdf.org>,
	Nikolay Nikolov <nickysn@users.sourceforge.net>,
	seabios@seabios.org, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Re: Regression with floppy drive controller
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:36:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820143614.GJ2867@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a45cee8-66e1-448d-78bc-4f0b9695cab4@redhat.com>

* Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (philmd@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 8/20/19 3:38 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 8/20/19 3:12 PM, John Snow wrote:
> >> On 8/20/19 6:25 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> [cross posting QEMU & SeaBIOS]
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'v been looking at a QEMU bug report [1] which bisection resulted in a
> >>> SeaBIOS commit:
> >>>
> >>> 4a6dbcea3e412fe12effa2f812f50dd7eae90955 is the first bad commit
> >>> commit 4a6dbcea3e412fe12effa2f812f50dd7eae90955
> >>> Author: Nikolay Nikolov <nickysn@users.sourceforge.net>
> >>> Date:   Sun Feb 4 17:27:01 2018 +0200
> >>>
> >>>     floppy: Use timer_check() in floppy_wait_irq()
> >>>
> >>>     Use timer_check() instead of using floppy_motor_counter in BDA for the
> >>>     timeout check in floppy_wait_irq().
> >>>
> >>>     The problem with using floppy_motor_counter was that, after it reaches
> >>>     0, it immediately stops the floppy motors, which is not what is
> >>>     supposed to happen on real hardware. Instead, after a timeout (like in
> >>>     the end of every floppy operation, regardless of the result - success,
> >>>     timeout or error), the floppy motors must be kept spinning for
> >>>     additional 2 seconds (the FLOPPY_MOTOR_TICKS). So, now the
> >>>     floppy_motor_counter is initialized to 255 (the max value) in the
> >>>     beginning of the floppy operation. For IRQ timeouts, a different
> >>>     timeout is used, specified by the new FLOPPY_IRQ_TIMEOUT constant
> >>>     (currently set to 5 seconds - a fairly conservative value, but should
> >>>     work reliably on most floppies).
> >>>
> >>>     After the floppy operation, floppy_drive_pio() resets the
> >>>     floppy_motor_counter to 2 seconds (FLOPPY_MOTOR_TICKS).
> >>>
> >>>     This is also consistent with what other PC BIOSes do.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This commit improve behavior with real hardware, so maybe QEMU is not
> >>> modelling something or modelling it incorrectly?
> > [...]
> >>
> >> Well, that's unfortunate.
> >>
> >> What version of QEMU shipped the SeaBIOS that caused the regression?
> > 
> > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1840719/comments/3
> > 
> > QEMU commit 0b8f74488e, slighly before QEMU v3.1.0
> > (previous tag is v3.0.0).
> > 
> > But you can use v4.1.0 too, simply change the SeaBIOS bios.bin, i.e.:
> > 
> >   qemu$ git checkout v4.1.0
> > 
> >   qemu$ (cd roms/seabios && git checkout 4a6dbcea3e4~) && \
> >         make -C roms bios
> > 
> > Now pc-bios/bios.bin is built using the last commit working,
> > 
> >   qemu$ (cd roms/seabios && git checkout 4a6dbcea3e4) && \
> >         make -C roms bios
> > 
> > And you can reproduce the error.
> 
> Looking at the fdc timer I noticed it use a static '50 ns' magic value.

That's not 50ns

> Increasing this value allows the floppy image to boot again, using this
> snippet:
> 
> -- >8 --
> diff --git a/hw/block/fdc.c b/hw/block/fdc.c
> index 9b24cb9b85..5fc54073fd 100644
> --- a/hw/block/fdc.c
> +++ b/hw/block/fdc.c
> @@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ static void fdctrl_handle_readid(FDCtrl *fdctrl,
> int direction)
> 
>      cur_drv->head = (fdctrl->fifo[1] >> 2) & 1;
>      timer_mod(fdctrl->result_timer, qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) +
> -             (NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / 50));

That's 1/50th of a second in ns.

> +             (NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / 5000));

I'm not too sure about readid; but assuming we're rotating at 360rpm,
that's 6 revolutions/second, and 18 sectors/track = 108 sectors/second
(half of that for a double density disk).

So, the wait for a sector to spin around and read feels like it should
be in the region of 1/108 of a second + some latency - so 1/50th of a
second would seem to be in the ballpark or being right, where as 1/5000
of a second is way too fast for a poor old floppy.

Dave

>  }
> 
>  static void fdctrl_handle_format_track(FDCtrl *fdctrl, int direction)
> ---
> 
> Any idea what is the correct value to use here?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.
> _______________________________________________
> SeaBIOS mailing list -- seabios@seabios.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to seabios-leave@seabios.org
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20 10:25 [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 13:12 ` John Snow
2019-08-20 13:38   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 14:00     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 14:36       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2019-08-20 14:54         ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 15:02           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 15:04           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-08-20 16:21     ` [Qemu-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-08-20 20:37       ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-08-21  6:42       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-08-21  7:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-21 13:31         ` [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] " Kevin O'Connor
2019-08-22  8:32           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-08-22  8:42             ` Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190820143614.GJ2867@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=coderain@sdf.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=nickysn@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=seabios@seabios.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).