From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF948C3A59E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EC0206DD for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C2EC0206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35396 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Y0t-0004on-RP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:19:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xz9-0003Jk-1o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:17:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xz5-0001yQ-22 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:17:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Xz4-0001y2-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 17:17:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A7887630; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-73.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.116.73]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744296012E; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:00:30 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Aleksandar Markovic Message-ID: <20190821210030.GH7077@habkost.net> References: <1564760158-27536-1-git-send-email-aleksandar.markovic@rt-rk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests/acceptance: Update MIPS Malta ssh test X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, f4bug@amsat.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aleksandar Markovic , amarkovic@wavecomp.com, crosa@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > 02.08.2019. 17.37, "Aleksandar Markovic" =D1=98=D0=B5 > =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BE/=D0=BB=D0=B0: > > > > From: Aleksandar Markovic > > > > This little series improves linux_ssh_mips_malta.py, both in the sens= e > > of code organization and in the sense of quantity of executed tests. > > >=20 > Hello, all. >=20 > I am going to send a new version in few days, and I have a question for > test team: >=20 > Currently, the outcome of the script execition is either PASS:1 FAIL:0 = or > PASS:0 FAIL:1. But the test actually consists of several subtests. Is t= here > any way that this single Python script considers these subtests as sepa= rate > tests (test cases), reporting something like PASS:12 FAIL:7? If yes, wh= at > would be the best way to achieve that? If you are talking about each test_*() method, they are already treated like separate tests. If you mean treating each ssh_command_output_contains() call as a separate test, this might be difficult. Cleber, is there something already available in the Avocado API that would help us report more fine-grained results inside each test case? >=20 > Thanks in advance, > Aleksandar >=20 > > Aleksandar Markovic (2): > > tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in > > linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > tests/acceptance: Add new test cases in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > > > tests/acceptance/linux_ssh_mips_malta.py | 81 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > --=20 Eduardo