From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A34FC3A5A1 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93055206B7 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:06:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 93055206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0pbz-0005sO-FU for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:06:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0pWW-0000tL-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:01:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0pWT-00009N-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:01:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0pWT-00008h-Oh; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:01:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38FDB796FC; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-222.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.222]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F12610C6; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 18:01:07 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: "Daniel P. =?UTF-8?B?QmVycmFuZ8Op?=" Message-ID: <20190822180107.062450ad.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190822155513.GY3267@redhat.com> References: <20190822174447.3be81c81.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190822155513.GY3267@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:01:12 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 'make check-unit' breakage on s390x host X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:55:13 +0100 Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 05:44:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > I just noticed a breakage with 'make check-unit' when running on an > > s390x host (on my laptop, it runs fine; haven't tried other > > architectures). This happens with current master, but I managed to > > track the original breakage down to > >=20 > > commit ff3dc8fefe953fd3650279e064bf63b212c5699a > > Author: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 > > Date: Wed Mar 13 17:36:18 2019 +0000 > >=20 > > filemon: ensure watch IDs are unique to QFileMonitor scope =20 >=20 > [snip] >=20 > > I can try to collect extra info if you tell me what would be helpful. = =20 >=20 > I'm betting you updated to kernel 5.3 Yeah, indeed... I would have been surprised if it were s390x-specific :) >=20 > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-08/msg04349.html >=20 > Just waiting for a Reviewed-by on that patch in order to send a PR.... I'll take a look, but can't promise anything (first time looking at that code path...) >=20 > Regards, > Daniel