From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
peterx@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
eric.auger.pro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] hw/vfio/common: Fail on VFIO/HW nested paging detection
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:14:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829121449.5c42073e@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829090141.21821-3-eric.auger@redhat.com>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:01:41 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
> As of today, VFIO only works along with vIOMMU supporting
> caching mode. The SMMUv3 does not support this mode and
> requires HW nested paging to work properly with VFIO.
>
> So any attempt to run a VFIO device protected by such IOMMU
> would prevent the assigned device from working and at the
> moment the guest does not even boot as the default
> memory_region_iommu_replay() implementation attempts to
> translate the whole address space and completely stalls
> the guest.
Why doesn't this stall an x86 guest?
I'm a bit confused about what this provides versus the flag_changed
notifier looking for IOMMU_NOTIFIER_MAP, which AIUI is the common
deficiency between VT-d w/o caching-mode and SMMUv3 w/o nested mode.
The iommu notifier is registered prior to calling iommu_replay, so it
seems we already have an opportunity to do something there. Help me
understand why this is needed. Thanks,
Alex
>
> So let's fail on that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - use IOMMU_ATTR_HW_NESTED_PAGING
> - do not abort anymore but jump to fail
> ---
> hw/vfio/common.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index 3e03c495d8..e8c009d019 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -606,9 +606,19 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> VFIOGuestIOMMU *giommu;
> IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION(section->mr);
> + bool nested;
> int iommu_idx;
>
> trace_vfio_listener_region_add_iommu(iova, end);
> +
> + if (!memory_region_iommu_get_attr(iommu_mr,
> + IOMMU_ATTR_NEED_HW_NESTED_PAGING,
> + (void *)&nested) && nested) {
> + error_report("VFIO/vIOMMU integration based on HW nested paging "
> + "is not yet supported");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail;
> + }
> /*
> * FIXME: For VFIO iommu types which have KVM acceleration to
> * avoid bouncing all map/unmaps through qemu this way, this
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 9:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] VFIO/SMMUv3: Fail on VFIO/HW nested paging detection Eric Auger
2019-08-29 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] memory: Add IOMMU_ATTR_NEED_HW_NESTED_PAGING IOMMU memory region attribute Eric Auger
2019-08-29 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] hw/vfio/common: Fail on VFIO/HW nested paging detection Eric Auger
2019-08-29 18:14 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2019-08-30 8:06 ` Auger Eric
2019-08-30 17:22 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829121449.5c42073e@x1.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).