From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7245CC43331 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7690C2070C for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:26:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7690C2070C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5wSr-0003c1-1J for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:26:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5wOC-0006ec-3q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:21:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5wOA-0006B1-SW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:21:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i5wOA-00069J-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:21:46 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E973DE0B for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.redhat.com (ovpn-116-234.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.234]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25165D6A3; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:21:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Eric Blake To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 13:21:28 -0500 Message-Id: <20190905182132.3563-6-eblake@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190905182132.3563-1-eblake@redhat.com> References: <20190905182132.3563-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 5/9] docs: Update preferred NBD device syntax X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Mention the preferred URI form, especially since NBD is trying to standardize that form: https://lists.debian.org/nbd/2019/06/msg00012.html Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Message-Id: <20190903145634.20237-1-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow --- qemu-doc.texi | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-doc.texi b/qemu-doc.texi index 577d1e837640..ec460f1d7af5 100644 --- a/qemu-doc.texi +++ b/qemu-doc.texi @@ -297,9 +297,16 @@ qemu-system-i386 -drive file=3Discsi://192.0.2.1/iqn= .2001-04.com.example/1 @item NBD QEMU supports NBD (Network Block Devices) both using TCP protocol as wel= l -as Unix Domain Sockets. +as Unix Domain Sockets. With TCP, the default port is 10809. -Syntax for specifying a NBD device using TCP +Syntax for specifying a NBD device using TCP, in preferred URI form: +``nbd://[:]/[]'' + +Syntax for specifying a NBD device using Unix Domain Sockets; remember +that '?' is a shell glob character and may need quoting: +``nbd+unix:///[]?socket=3D'' + +Older syntax that is also recognized: ``nbd::[:exportname=3D]'' Syntax for specifying a NBD device using Unix Domain Sockets --=20 2.21.0