From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D83C432C1 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF05420640 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EF05420640 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41938 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCfNG-0005ns-5t for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:36:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCfMW-0005MK-FR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:35:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCfMS-00067U-3r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:35:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCfMR-000670-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:35:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89A930ADBA3; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-112-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D99100EBA4; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:35:13 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Eduardo Habkost Subject: Re: Debian support lifetime (was Re: [PATCH] docker: move tests from python2 to python3) Message-ID: <20190924073513.GA2106@redhat.com> References: <20190920200049.27216-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <20190923145057.GC9445@dhcp-17-179.bos.redhat.com> <6ac39e69-4982-dc35-d853-fedbb1c12e1a@redhat.com> <20190923190533.GR5035@habkost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190923190533.GR5035@habkost.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:35:45 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, John Snow , Cleber Rosa , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:05:33PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:19:41PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > On 9/23/19 10:50 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > [...] > > >> diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-xtensa-cross.docker b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-xtensa-cross.docker > > >> index b9c2e2e531..e6f93f65ee 100644 > > >> --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-xtensa-cross.docker > > >> +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/debian-xtensa-cross.docker > > >> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ RUN apt-get update && \ > > >> flex \ > > >> gettext \ > > >> git \ > > >> - python-minimal > > >> + python3-minimal > > > > > > I'm getting Python 3.5.3-1+deb9u1 here, so it LGTM. > > > > > > > Oh, that's actually a bit of a problem. I tested on 3.5+, but I think > > some people want 3.6+. > > > > I don't know much about Debian, but we either need to guarantee 3.6+ or > > backtrack our plans to 3.5+. > > Good catch. I forgot we were going to keep 3.5 support because > of Debian 9. > > Now, I'd like to clarify what the wording on our supported build > platforms documentation is supposed to mean for Debian. > > The document says: > > ] For distributions with frequent, short-lifetime releases, the project will > ] aim to support all versions that are not end of life by their respective > ] vendors. For the purposes of identifying supported software versions, the > ] project will look at Fedora, Ubuntu, and openSUSE distros. Other short- > ] lifetime distros will be assumed to ship similar software versions. > ] > ] For distributions with long-lifetime releases, the project will aim to support > ] the most recent major version at all times. Support for the previous major > ] version will be dropped 2 years after the new major version is released. For > ] the purposes of identifying supported software versions, the project will look > ] at RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu LTS, and SLES distros. Other long-lifetime distros will > ] be assumed to ship similar software versions. > > Debian 10 was released in July 2019. Are we really willing to > support Debian 9 as a supported build platform until July 2021? > The Debian Project itself won't support Debian 9 after July 2020. This is an oversight on my part - I didn't realize Debian releases were supported for such a short time in parallel. There should be a general statement that, no matter what else the policy states, we do *NOT* support any distro that has been end of life by its vendor. > Even for other long-lifetime distros, I really think "2 years > after the new major version is released" is too long, and I'd > like to shorten this to 1 year. I guess this is ok, since this. is still quite a long life time of support for distros. eg RHEL has a 3-4 year gap between major releases, that gives 4-5 years for each release being supported by QEMU. Other LTS distros are similar Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|