From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/25] qapi: Reorder check_FOO() parameters for consistency
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:28:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190924132830.15835-9-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190924132830.15835-1-armbru@redhat.com>
Most check_FOO() take the thing being checked as first argument.
check_name(), check_type(), check_known_keys() don't. Clean that up.
While there, drop a "Todo" comment that should have been dropped in
commit 87adbbffd4 "qapi: add a dictionary form for TYPE".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
scripts/qapi/common.py | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/qapi/common.py b/scripts/qapi/common.py
index 749490c517..25818b0ea0 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/common.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/common.py
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ valid_name = re.compile(r'^(__[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+_)?'
'[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$')
-def check_name(info, source, name,
+def check_name(name, info, source,
allow_optional=False, enum_member=False, permit_upper=False):
global valid_name
membername = name
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ def check_name(info, source, name,
def add_name(name, info, meta):
global all_names
- check_name(info, "'%s'" % meta, name, permit_upper=True)
+ check_name(name, info, "'%s'" % meta, permit_upper=True)
# FIXME should reject names that differ only in '_' vs. '.'
# vs. '-', because they're liable to clash in generated C.
if name in all_names:
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ def check_if(expr, info):
check_if_str(ifcond, info)
-def check_type(info, source, value,
+def check_type(value, info, source,
allow_array=False, allow_dict=False, allow_metas=[]):
global all_names
@@ -805,19 +805,17 @@ def check_type(info, source, value,
# value is a dictionary, check that each member is okay
for (key, arg) in value.items():
- check_name(info, "member of %s" % source, key,
+ check_name(key, info, "member of %s" % source,
allow_optional=True, permit_upper=permit_upper)
if c_name(key, False) == 'u' or c_name(key, False).startswith('has_'):
raise QAPISemError(
info, "member of %s uses reserved name '%s'" % (source, key))
- # Todo: allow dictionaries to represent default values of
- # an optional argument.
- check_known_keys(info, "member '%s' of %s" % (key, source),
- arg, ['type'], ['if'])
+ check_known_keys(arg, info, "member '%s' of %s" % (key, source),
+ ['type'], ['if'])
check_if(arg, info)
normalize_if(arg)
- check_type(info, "member '%s' of %s" % (key, source),
- arg['type'], allow_array=True,
+ check_type(arg['type'], info, "member '%s' of %s" % (key, source),
+ allow_array=True,
allow_metas=['built-in', 'union', 'alternate', 'struct',
'enum'])
@@ -829,15 +827,15 @@ def check_command(expr, info):
args_meta = ['struct']
if boxed:
args_meta += ['union']
- check_type(info, "'data' for command '%s'" % name,
- expr.get('data'), allow_dict=not boxed,
- allow_metas=args_meta)
+ check_type(expr.get('data'), info,
+ "'data' for command '%s'" % name,
+ allow_dict=not boxed, allow_metas=args_meta)
returns_meta = ['union', 'struct']
if name in returns_whitelist:
returns_meta += ['built-in', 'alternate', 'enum']
- check_type(info, "'returns' for command '%s'" % name,
- expr.get('returns'), allow_array=True,
- allow_metas=returns_meta)
+ check_type(expr.get('returns'), info,
+ "'returns' for command '%s'" % name,
+ allow_array=True, allow_metas=returns_meta)
def check_event(expr, info):
@@ -847,9 +845,9 @@ def check_event(expr, info):
meta = ['struct']
if boxed:
meta += ['union']
- check_type(info, "'data' for event '%s'" % name,
- expr.get('data'), allow_dict=not boxed,
- allow_metas=meta)
+ check_type(expr.get('data'), info,
+ "'data' for event '%s'" % name,
+ allow_dict=not boxed, allow_metas=meta)
def enum_get_names(expr):
@@ -875,9 +873,8 @@ def check_union(expr, info):
# Else, it's a flat union.
else:
# The object must have a string or dictionary 'base'.
- check_type(info, "'base' for union '%s'" % name,
- base, allow_dict=name,
- allow_metas=['struct'])
+ check_type(base, info, "'base' for union '%s'" % name,
+ allow_dict=name, allow_metas=['struct'])
if not base:
raise QAPISemError(info, "flat union '%s' must have a base"
% name)
@@ -886,8 +883,8 @@ def check_union(expr, info):
# The value of member 'discriminator' must name a non-optional
# member of the base struct.
- check_name(info, "discriminator of flat union '%s'" % name,
- discriminator)
+ check_name(discriminator, info,
+ "discriminator of flat union '%s'" % name)
discriminator_value = base_members.get(discriminator)
if not discriminator_value:
raise QAPISemError(info,
@@ -912,15 +909,16 @@ def check_union(expr, info):
raise QAPISemError(info, "union '%s' has no branches" % name)
for (key, value) in members.items():
- check_name(info, "member of union '%s'" % name, key)
+ check_name(key, info, "member of union '%s'" % name)
- check_known_keys(info, "member '%s' of union '%s'" % (key, name),
- value, ['type'], ['if'])
+ check_known_keys(value, info,
+ "member '%s' of union '%s'" % (key, name),
+ ['type'], ['if'])
check_if(value, info)
normalize_if(value)
# Each value must name a known type
- check_type(info, "member '%s' of union '%s'" % (key, name),
- value['type'],
+ check_type(value['type'], info,
+ "member '%s' of union '%s'" % (key, name),
allow_array=not base, allow_metas=allow_metas)
# If the discriminator names an enum type, then all members
@@ -942,16 +940,16 @@ def check_alternate(expr, info):
raise QAPISemError(info,
"alternate '%s' cannot have empty 'data'" % name)
for (key, value) in members.items():
- check_name(info, "member of alternate '%s'" % name, key)
- check_known_keys(info,
+ check_name(key, info, "member of alternate '%s'" % name)
+ check_known_keys(value, info,
"member '%s' of alternate '%s'" % (key, name),
- value, ['type'], ['if'])
+ ['type'], ['if'])
check_if(value, info)
normalize_if(value)
typ = value['type']
# Ensure alternates have no type conflicts.
- check_type(info, "member '%s' of alternate '%s'" % (key, name), typ,
+ check_type(typ, info, "member '%s' of alternate '%s'" % (key, name),
allow_metas=['built-in', 'union', 'struct', 'enum'])
qtype = find_alternate_member_qtype(typ)
if not qtype:
@@ -996,11 +994,11 @@ def check_enum(expr, info):
permit_upper = name in name_case_whitelist
for member in members:
- check_known_keys(info, "member of enum '%s'" % name, member,
+ check_known_keys(member, info, "member of enum '%s'" % name,
['name'], ['if'])
check_if(member, info)
normalize_if(member)
- check_name(info, "member of enum '%s'" % name, member['name'],
+ check_name(member['name'], info, "member of enum '%s'" % name,
enum_member=True, permit_upper=permit_upper)
@@ -1009,9 +1007,9 @@ def check_struct(expr, info):
members = expr['data']
features = expr.get('features')
- check_type(info, "'data' for struct '%s'" % name, members,
+ check_type(members, info, "'data' for struct '%s'" % name,
allow_dict=name)
- check_type(info, "'base' for struct '%s'" % name, expr.get('base'),
+ check_type(expr.get('base'), info, "'base' for struct '%s'" % name,
allow_metas=['struct'])
if features:
@@ -1020,15 +1018,15 @@ def check_struct(expr, info):
info, "struct '%s' requires an array for 'features'" % name)
for f in features:
assert isinstance(f, dict)
- check_known_keys(info, "feature of struct %s" % name, f,
+ check_known_keys(f, info, "feature of struct %s" % name,
['name'], ['if'])
check_if(f, info)
normalize_if(f)
- check_name(info, "feature of struct %s" % name, f['name'])
+ check_name(f['name'], info, "feature of struct %s" % name)
-def check_known_keys(info, source, value, required, optional):
+def check_known_keys(value, info, source, required, optional):
def pprint(elems):
return ', '.join("'" + e + "'" for e in sorted(elems))
@@ -1052,7 +1050,7 @@ def check_keys(expr, info, meta, required, optional=[]):
raise QAPISemError(info, "'%s' key must have a string value" % meta)
required = required + [meta]
source = "%s '%s'" % (meta, name)
- check_known_keys(info, source, expr, required, optional)
+ check_known_keys(expr, info, source, required, optional)
for (key, value) in expr.items():
if key in ['gen', 'success-response'] and value is not False:
raise QAPISemError(info,
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 13:28 [PATCH 00/25] qapi: Pay back some frontend technical debt Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] qapi: Tighten QAPISchemaFOO.check() assertions Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 14:39 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] qapi: Rename .owner to .defined_in Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 14:41 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] qapi: New QAPISourceInfo, replacing dict Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 14:51 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 19:12 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-25 6:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] qapi: Prefix frontend errors with an "in definition" line Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 14:58 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] qapi: Clean up member name case checking Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] qapi: Change frontend error messages to start with lower case Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:17 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] qapi: Improve reporting of member name clashes Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:38 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-09-24 15:41 ` [PATCH 08/25] qapi: Reorder check_FOO() parameters for consistency Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid name errors Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:48 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] qapi: Use check_name_str() where it suffices Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:50 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] qapi: Report invalid '*' prefix like any other invalid name Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:52 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] qapi: Move check for reserved names out of add_name() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:56 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] qapi: Make check_type()'s array case a bit more obvious Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 15:57 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] qapi: Plumb info to the QAPISchemaMember Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 16:01 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] qapi: Inline check_name() into check_union() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 16:39 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] qapi: Move context-sensitive checking to the proper place Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 17:49 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] qapi: Move context-free " Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 17:59 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid 'if' errors Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 18:01 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid flags Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 18:07 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-25 6:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] qapi: Improve reporting of missing / unknown definition keys Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 18:13 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] qapi: Avoid redundant definition references in error messages Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 18:46 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] qapi: Eliminate check_keys(), rename check_known_keys() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 18:49 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] qapi: Improve reporting of missing documentation comment Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 19:44 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] qapi: Improve reporting of redefinition Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 19:53 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] qapi: Improve source file read error handling Markus Armbruster
2019-09-24 19:57 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-24 20:59 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190924132830.15835-9-armbru@redhat.com \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).