From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
peterx@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/4] kvm: extract kvm_log_clear_one_slot
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:47:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190924144751.24149-2-imammedo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190924144751.24149-1-imammedo@redhat.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We may need to clear the dirty bitmap for more than one KVM memslot.
First do some code movement with no semantic change.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index b09bad0804..e9e6086c09 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -575,55 +575,13 @@ out:
#define KVM_CLEAR_LOG_ALIGN (qemu_real_host_page_size << KVM_CLEAR_LOG_SHIFT)
#define KVM_CLEAR_LOG_MASK (-KVM_CLEAR_LOG_ALIGN)
-/**
- * kvm_physical_log_clear - Clear the kernel's dirty bitmap for range
- *
- * NOTE: this will be a no-op if we haven't enabled manual dirty log
- * protection in the host kernel because in that case this operation
- * will be done within log_sync().
- *
- * @kml: the kvm memory listener
- * @section: the memory range to clear dirty bitmap
- */
-static int kvm_physical_log_clear(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
- MemoryRegionSection *section)
+static int kvm_log_clear_one_slot(KVMSlot *mem, int as_id, uint64_t start, uint64_t size)
{
KVMState *s = kvm_state;
+ uint64_t end, bmap_start, start_delta, bmap_npages;
struct kvm_clear_dirty_log d;
- uint64_t start, end, bmap_start, start_delta, bmap_npages, size;
unsigned long *bmap_clear = NULL, psize = qemu_real_host_page_size;
- KVMSlot *mem = NULL;
- int ret, i;
-
- if (!s->manual_dirty_log_protect) {
- /* No need to do explicit clear */
- return 0;
- }
-
- start = section->offset_within_address_space;
- size = int128_get64(section->size);
-
- if (!size) {
- /* Nothing more we can do... */
- return 0;
- }
-
- kvm_slots_lock(kml);
-
- /* Find any possible slot that covers the section */
- for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
- mem = &kml->slots[i];
- if (mem->start_addr <= start &&
- start + size <= mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size) {
- break;
- }
- }
-
- /*
- * We should always find one memslot until this point, otherwise
- * there could be something wrong from the upper layer
- */
- assert(mem && i != s->nr_slots);
+ int ret;
/*
* We need to extend either the start or the size or both to
@@ -694,7 +652,7 @@ static int kvm_physical_log_clear(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
/* It should never overflow. If it happens, say something */
assert(bmap_npages <= UINT32_MAX);
d.num_pages = bmap_npages;
- d.slot = mem->slot | (kml->as_id << 16);
+ d.slot = mem->slot | (as_id << 16);
if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) {
ret = -errno;
@@ -717,6 +675,58 @@ static int kvm_physical_log_clear(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
size / psize);
/* This handles the NULL case well */
g_free(bmap_clear);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * kvm_physical_log_clear - Clear the kernel's dirty bitmap for range
+ *
+ * NOTE: this will be a no-op if we haven't enabled manual dirty log
+ * protection in the host kernel because in that case this operation
+ * will be done within log_sync().
+ *
+ * @kml: the kvm memory listener
+ * @section: the memory range to clear dirty bitmap
+ */
+static int kvm_physical_log_clear(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
+ MemoryRegionSection *section)
+{
+ KVMState *s = kvm_state;
+ uint64_t start, size;
+ KVMSlot *mem = NULL;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ if (!s->manual_dirty_log_protect) {
+ /* No need to do explicit clear */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ start = section->offset_within_address_space;
+ size = int128_get64(section->size);
+
+ if (!size) {
+ /* Nothing more we can do... */
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ kvm_slots_lock(kml);
+
+ /* Find any possible slot that covers the section */
+ for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
+ mem = &kml->slots[i];
+ if (mem->start_addr <= start &&
+ start + size <= mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We should always find one memslot until this point, otherwise
+ * there could be something wrong from the upper layer
+ */
+ assert(mem && i != s->nr_slots);
+ ret = kvm_log_clear_one_slot(mem, kml->as_id, start, size);
kvm_slots_unlock(kml);
--
2.18.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-24 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 14:47 [PATCH v7 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory() Igor Mammedov
2019-09-24 14:47 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-09-30 10:25 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] kvm: extract kvm_log_clear_one_slot Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-24 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] kvm: clear dirty bitmaps from all overlapping memslots Igor Mammedov
2019-09-24 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] kvm: split too big memory section on several memslots Igor Mammedov
2019-09-25 3:12 ` Peter Xu
2019-09-25 12:09 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-25 23:45 ` Peter Xu
2019-09-24 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] s390: do not call memory_region_allocate_system_memory() multiple times Igor Mammedov
2019-09-25 3:27 ` Peter Xu
2019-09-25 11:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-25 23:52 ` Peter Xu
2019-09-27 13:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-28 1:28 ` Peter Xu
2019-09-30 7:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-30 9:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-09-30 10:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-30 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-25 7:47 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory() Christian Borntraeger
2019-09-30 11:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190924144751.24149-2-imammedo@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).