qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/26] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid 'if' errors
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:46:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190927134639.4284-19-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190927134639.4284-1-armbru@redhat.com>

Move check_if() from check_keys() to check_exprs() and call it later,
so its error messages gain an "in definition" line.

Checking values in a function named check_keys() is unclean anyway.
The original sin was commit 0545f6b887 "qapi: Better error messages
for bad expressions", which checks the value of key 'name'.  More
sinning in commit 2cbf09925a "qapi: More rigorous checking for type
safety bypass", commit c818408e44 "qapi: Implement boxed types for
commands/events", and commit 967c885108 "qapi: add 'if' to top-level
expressions".  This commit does penance for the latter.  The next
commits will do penance for the others.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
 scripts/qapi/common.py                  | 4 ++--
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.err | 1 +
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.err      | 1 +
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.err       | 1 +
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.err            | 1 +
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/qapi/common.py b/scripts/qapi/common.py
index 2e1d8158d6..8f96974f85 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/common.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/common.py
@@ -925,8 +925,6 @@ def check_keys(expr, info, meta, required, optional=[]):
             raise QAPISemError(info,
                                "'%s' of %s '%s' should only use true value"
                                % (key, meta, name))
-        if key == 'if':
-            check_if(expr, info)
 
 
 def normalize_enum(expr):
@@ -1028,6 +1026,8 @@ def check_exprs(exprs):
         else:
             assert False, 'unexpected meta type'
 
+        check_if(expr, info)
+
         if doc:
             doc.check_expr(expr)
 
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.err b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.err
index 75fe6497bc..2218c9279b 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.err
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.err
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.json: In struct 'TestIfStruct':
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty-list.json:2: 'if' condition [] is useless
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.err b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.err
index 358bdc3e51..a3fdb3009d 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.err
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.err
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.json: In struct 'TestIfStruct':
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-empty.json:2: 'if' condition '' makes no sense
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.err b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.err
index 53af099083..e03bf0fc3a 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.err
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.err
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.json: In struct 'TestIfStruct':
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if-list.json:2: 'if' condition ' ' makes no sense
diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.err b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.err
index c2e3f5f44c..190216c109 100644
--- a/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.err
+++ b/tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.err
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.json: In struct 'TestIfStruct':
 tests/qapi-schema/bad-if.json:2: 'if' condition must be a string or a list of strings
-- 
2.21.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-27 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-27 13:46 [PATCH v2 00/26] qapi: Pay back some frontend technical debt Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] qapi: Tighten QAPISchemaFOO.check() assertions Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] qapi: Rename .owner to .defined_in Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] qapi: New QAPISourceInfo, replacing dict Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] qapi: Prefix frontend errors with an "in definition" line Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] qapi: Clean up member name case checking Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] qapi: Change frontend error messages to start with lower case Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] qapi: Improve reporting of member name clashes Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] qapi: Reorder check_FOO() parameters for consistency Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid name errors Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] qapi: Use check_name_str() where it suffices Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] qapi: Report invalid '*' prefix like any other invalid name Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] qapi: Move check for reserved names out of add_name() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] qapi: Make check_type()'s array case a bit more obvious Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] qapi: Plumb info to the QAPISchemaMember Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] qapi: Inline check_name() into check_union() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] qapi: Move context-sensitive checking to the proper place Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] qapi: Move context-free " Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid flags Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] qapi: Improve reporting of missing / unknown definition keys Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] qapi: Avoid redundant definition references in error messages Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 15:03   ` Eric Blake
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] qapi: Improve reporting of invalid 'if' further Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 16:08   ` Eric Blake
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 23/26] qapi: Eliminate check_keys(), rename check_known_keys() Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 24/26] qapi: Improve reporting of missing documentation comment Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] qapi: Improve reporting of redefinition Markus Armbruster
2019-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] qapi: Improve source file read error handling Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190927134639.4284-19-armbru@redhat.com \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).