From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Skip LinuxInitrd.test_with_2gib_file_should_exit_error_msg_with_linux_v3_6 on 32-bit hosts?
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 19:52:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191004095232.GA29310@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191004083237.GA25716@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1924 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 09:33:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Re-adding qemu-devel since it seems to have been Bcc'd.
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:29:06PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > When I run make check-acceptance in a 32-bit (i686) container, this
> > test fails, because it tries to start a guest with 4G of RAM, which
> > can't fit in the userspace address space on a 32-bit host, obviously.
> >
> > (16/44) /home/dwg/src/qemu/tests/acceptance/linux_initrd.py:LinuxInitrd.test_with_2gib_file_should_exit_error_msg_with_linux_v3_6: FAIL: Regex didn't match: '.*initrd is too large.*max: \\d+, need 2147483648.*' not found in 'qemu-system-x86_64: -m 4096: ram size too large\n' (0.12 s)
> >
> > Should we simply skip this test on 32-bit hosts?
>
> There's a thread right now asking if we should drop support for 32-bit
> hosts entirely
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-09/msg06168.html
Huh.
> I'm curious why you were testing with 32-bit host ? Do you have some
> use case that needs it, or was this just responding to some user bug
> report
A 32-bit build (actually, a couple) is part of my routine pre-pull
tests, precisely because I've accidentally included some things that
broken them.
> As long as we do support 32-bit hosts though, this test definitely needs
> fixing. It is attempting to boot with a 2 GB initrd, so I guess RAM
> needs to be big enough to fit that & boot the guest OS image. Possibly
> it might still work in 2.5-3.0 GB of RAM in guest if that's sufficiently
> small for 32-bit host testing. If not, then skipping seems reasonable,
> as no one will ever use such huge initrds on 32-bit hosts in real
> world.
Right.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191004052906.GC27597@umbus.fritz.box>
2019-10-04 8:33 ` Skip LinuxInitrd.test_with_2gib_file_should_exit_error_msg_with_linux_v3_6 on 32-bit hosts? Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-10-04 9:52 ` David Gibson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191004095232.GA29310@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).