From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: deller@gmx.de, mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, hpoussin@reactos.org,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, atar4qemu@gmail.com,
rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eliminate remaining places that abuse memory_region_allocate_system_memory()
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:52:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008155208.59b22535@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b7466af-2c05-f47e-f218-30a8b5ed5663@redhat.com>
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:41:25 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On 10/8/19 1:33 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Series cleans up remaining boards that call memory_region_allocate_system_memory()
> > multiple times, violating interface contract (the function should be called only
> > once).
> >
> > With that cleaned up, it should be possible to switch from adhoc RAM allocation
> > in memory_region_allocate_system_memory()->allocate_system_memory_nonnuma() to
> > memory-backend based allocation, remaining roadblock for doing it is deprecated
> > -mem-path fallback to RAM allocation, which is scheduled for removal at 4.3
> > merge window. So remaining patches to consolidate system RAM allocation around
> > memory-backends and aliasing -mem-path/mem-prealloc to it are postponed till
> > then.
>
> How do we protect the codebase for new boards to not make the same mistake?
>
> What about some code like this snippet (or nicer, but since this is a
> developer error, and assert is enough IMO):
probably it's not worth effort (it's not too long till 4.2 softfreeze).
Like cover letter say, I'm planing to finish refactoring of
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() and I hope this function
will be gone during 4.3 and most boards will only need to map
pre-created (by common code) memory-backend wherever they used to
map RAM memory region.
> -- >8 --
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
> index 4dfec5c95b..a487677672 100644
> --- a/hw/core/numa.c
> +++ b/hw/core/numa.c
> @@ -484,6 +484,11 @@ static void
> allocate_system_memory_nonnuma(MemoryRegion *mr, Object *owner,
> const char *name,
> uint64_t ram_size)
> {
> + static bool nonnuma_system_memory_allocated;
> +
> + g_assert(!nonnuma_system_memory_allocated);
> + nonnuma_system_memory_allocated = true;
> +
> if (mem_path) {
> #ifdef __linux__
> Error *err = NULL;
> ---
>
> $ hppa-softmmu/qemu-system-hppa
> **
> ERROR:/home/phil/source/qemu/hw/core/numa.c:489:allocate_system_memory_nonnuma:
> assertion failed: (!nonnuma_system_memory_allocated)
> Aborted (core dumped)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-08 11:33 [PATCH 0/3] eliminate remaining places that abuse memory_region_allocate_system_memory() Igor Mammedov
2019-10-08 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] sparc64: use memory_region_allocate_system_memory() only for '-m' specified RAM Igor Mammedov
2019-10-08 12:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-08 13:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-08 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] ppc: rs6000_mc: drop usage of memory_region_allocate_system_memory() Igor Mammedov
2019-10-08 12:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-09 1:21 ` David Gibson
2019-10-09 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-09 12:02 ` David Gibson
2019-10-08 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] hppa: drop usage of memory_region_allocate_system_memory() for ROM Igor Mammedov
2019-10-08 12:30 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-20 21:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-08 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/3] eliminate remaining places that abuse memory_region_allocate_system_memory() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-08 13:52 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-10-10 17:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-11 15:23 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-10-20 14:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-22 22:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-10-21 8:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-21 9:18 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191008155208.59b22535@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=atar4qemu@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).