From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957ECC4360C for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F01206A1 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:03:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 68F01206A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJDJA-0002gZ-Jt for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 05:03:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJDII-000207-3R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 05:02:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJDIH-0003sO-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 05:02:33 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:50569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJDIG-0003rL-S7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 05:02:33 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Oct 2019 02:02:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,287,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="197816963" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2019 02:02:25 -0700 Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:02:09 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] refine memory_device_get_free_addr Message-ID: <20191012090209.GA6047@richard> References: <20190730003740.20694-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20190913234746.jb5a5vlwl6cebudz@master> <20190914154026-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190914154026-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 134.134.136.100 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wei Yang , Wei Yang , imammedo@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:47:46PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:37:38AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> >When we iterate the memory-device list to get the available range, it is not >> >necessary to iterate the whole list. >> > >> >1) no more overlap for hinted range if tmp exceed it >> > >> >v2: >> > * remove #2 as suggested by Igor and David >> > * add some comment to inform address assignment stay the same as before >> > this change >> > >> >Wei Yang (2): >> > memory-device: not necessary to use goto for the last check >> > memory-device: break the loop if tmp exceed the hinted range >> > >> > hw/mem/memory-device.c | 3 ++- >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> >> Would someone take this patch set? > >yes looks good to me too. >Eduardo? > Hmm... I don't see this any where. May I ask the status? >> >-- >> >2.17.1 >> > >> >> -- >> Wei Yang >> Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me