From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:29:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017172954.4e9712de.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e689f2b-9bed-e40e-c761-6f38efaae635@redhat.com>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:40:56 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 17/10/2019 16.34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:21:23 +0200
> > Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There is no USB on s390x, so running qemu-system-s390x with
> >> "-machine ...,usb=on" is certainly wrong. Emit a warning to make
> >> the users aware of their misconfiguration.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> After a year or two, we could finally turn this into a hard error,
> >> but I think we should give the users some time to fix their command
> >> lines first, so I'm initially only emitting a warning here.
> >>
> >> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 ++++
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> index d3edeef0ad..af8c4c0daf 100644
> >> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> >> @@ -243,6 +243,10 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
> >> VirtualCssBus *css_bus;
> >> DeviceState *dev;
> >>
> >> + if (machine->usb) {
> >> + warn_report("This machine does not support USB");
> >
> > I'm wondering if this is the only machine type not supporting usb...
> > if not, how are others handling it?
>
> I think most machines are silently ignoring it, like we did on s390x
> until now, too.
I'm wondering how many options we have that do nothing when configured
:)
>
> > The usb parsing code in machine.c does not care if usb is even
> > configured (CONFIG_USB).
>
> machine.c is common code, so you can not use CONFIG_USB there.
Hm, yes.
>
> > There's other stuff in there like
> > igd-passthru, which seems to be x86 specific; probably historical
> > reasons?
>
> IMHO igd-passthru should be moved to the xen machine, which seems to be
> the only user.
OTOH, I can currently specify igd-passthru=on on any machine, which
would break if we moved it. Not that it makes any sense...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 14:21 [PATCH] hw/s390x: Emit a warning if user tried to enable USB Thomas Huth
2019-10-17 14:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-17 14:40 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-17 15:29 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-10-18 5:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-10-17 18:18 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-18 6:35 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 7:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-18 8:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-17 14:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-10-17 16:14 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017172954.4e9712de.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).