From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] libqos: add VIRTIO PCI 1.0 support
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:05:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018100501.GA9360@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2545dd3e-f398-0e7a-0f82-fc340034a004@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3922 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 08:48:23AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17/10/2019 18.18, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 17/10/2019 18.07, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> On 11/10/2019 10.56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>>> Implement the VIRTIO 1.0 virtio-pci interface. The main change here is
> >>>> that the register layout is no longer a fixed layout in BAR 0. Instead
> >>>> we have to iterate of PCI Capabilities to find descriptions of where
> >>>> various registers are located. The vring registers are also more
> >>>> fine-grained, allowing for more flexible vring layouts, but we don't
> >>>> take advantage of that.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that test cases do not negotiate VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 yet and are
> >>>> therefore not running in VIRTIO 1.0 mode.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> tests/Makefile.include | 1 +
> >>>> tests/libqos/virtio-pci-modern.h | 17 ++
> >>>> tests/libqos/virtio-pci.h | 10 +
> >>>> tests/libqos/virtio-pci-modern.c | 412 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> tests/libqos/virtio-pci.c | 6 +-
> >>>> 5 files changed, 445 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>> create mode 100644 tests/libqos/virtio-pci-modern.h
> >>>> create mode 100644 tests/libqos/virtio-pci-modern.c
> >>> [...]
> >>>> +static bool probe_device_type(QVirtioPCIDevice *dev)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + uint16_t vendor_id;
> >>>> + uint16_t device_id;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* "Drivers MUST match devices with the PCI Vendor ID 0x1AF4" */
> >>>> + vendor_id = qpci_config_readw(dev->pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
> >>>> + if (vendor_id != 0x1af4) {
> >>>> + return false;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * "Any PCI device with ... PCI Device ID 0x1000 through 0x107F inclusive
> >>>> + * is a virtio device"
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + device_id = qpci_config_readw(dev->pdev, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
> >>>> + if (device_id < 0x1000 || device_id > 0x107f) {
> >>>> + return false;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * "Devices MAY utilize a Transitional PCI Device ID range, 0x1000 to
> >>>> + * 0x103F depending on the device type"
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + if (device_id < 0x1040) {
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * "Transitional devices MUST have the PCI Subsystem Device ID matching
> >>>> + * the Virtio Device ID"
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + dev->vdev.device_type = qpci_config_readw(dev->pdev, PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID);
> >>>
> >>> Shouldn't you return "false" here in case the device_type is 0 ? Which
> >>> likely means that it is a legacy or broken device ...?
> >>
> >> The real decision whether to use this PCI device or not happens in
> >> probe_device_layout(). If it's broken or a legacy device then that
> >> function will fail.
> >
> > Ok, fair.
> >
> > I've added the patches to my qtest-next branch:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/tree/qtest-next
>
> Hi Stephan,
>
> looks like this is breaking the virtio-blk-test in certain configurations:
>
> https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/324085741
>
> and:
>
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4511314474434560
>
> Could you please have a look?
On reading the VIRTIO specification again, I think my idea of supporting
the VIRTIO 1.0 PCI interface without actually negotiating the
VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature bit is non-compliant:
2.2.3 Legacy Interface: A Note on Feature Bits
Transitional Drivers MUST detect Legacy Devices by detecting that the feature bit VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 is not offered. [...]
In this case device is used through the legacy interface.
Please drop this patch series for now. Additional patches are required
to implement VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 and then the endianness issue will go
away. I will send a v2.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 8:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] libqos: add VIRTIO PCI 1.0 support Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] libqos: extract Legacy virtio-pci.c code Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:20 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-16 12:04 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] libqos: add iteration support to qpci_find_capability() Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:22 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-16 12:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] libqos: pass full QVirtQueue to set_queue_address() Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:22 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-16 12:15 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] libqos: add MSI-X callbacks to QVirtioPCIDevice Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:23 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-17 13:25 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] libqos: expose common virtqueue setup/cleanup functions Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:23 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-17 14:13 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] libqos: make the virtio-pci BAR index configurable Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:06 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-14 9:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-14 10:46 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-17 14:27 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-11 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] libqos: add VIRTIO PCI 1.0 support Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-11 12:24 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-10-17 14:52 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-17 16:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-17 16:18 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 6:48 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 6:51 ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-18 10:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018100501.GA9360@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).