From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] runstate: ignore exit request in finish migrate state
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:10:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022101015.GD2815@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac941d4f-fd24-a84c-05d9-c0770a2fb088@redhat.com>
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 17/10/19 12:18, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Trying to reboot a VM while a migration is running can
> > move to the prelaunch state (because of the reset) while
> > the runstate is in finish migrate state.
> > As the logical step after the finish migrate is postmigrate,
> > this can create an invalid state transition from prelaunch state
> > to postmigrate state and this raises an error and aborts:
> >
> > invalid runstate transition: 'prelaunch' -> 'postmigrate'
> >
> > As we are not able to manage reset in finish migrate state the
> > best we can do is to ignore any changes and delay them until
> > the next state which should be postmigrate and which should allow
> > this kind of transition.
> >
> > Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > vl.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> > index 0a295e5d77d6..dc71c822ba24 100644
> > --- a/vl.c
> > +++ b/vl.c
> > @@ -1744,6 +1744,9 @@ static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
> > RunState r;
> > ShutdownCause request;
> >
> > + if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE)) {
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > if (preconfig_exit_requested) {
> > if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PRECONFIG)) {
> > runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH);
> >
>
> Your patch makes sense, but I don't understand this function very much.
> In particular I don't understand why it returns true when
> preconfig_exit_requested is true. Wouldn't that cause main_loop() and
> thus QEMU to exit? Igor, can you help?
It's because we now run main_loop() twice; once in the preconfig state
and once the main main loop.
4323 /* do monitor/qmp handling at preconfig state if requested */
4324 main_loop();
....
4452 os_setup_post();
4453
4454 main_loop();
4455
4456 gdbserver_cleanup();
> Paolo
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 10:18 [PATCH] runstate: ignore exit request in finish migrate state Laurent Vivier
2019-10-22 8:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-10-22 10:10 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2019-10-22 10:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-10-22 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022101015.GD2815@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).