From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81721CA9EA0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E3220659 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 51E3220659 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56394 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMu14-00081U-H3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:16:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtpC-0002sA-HJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:03:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtpB-0008QE-ET for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:03:46 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:48762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMtpB-0008Os-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:03:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654EE1FDA; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:03:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fc1g4LzXio5l; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from function (unknown [62.102.229.57]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BBBD1E7D; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from samy by function with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMu1J-0003jP-3g; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:16:17 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:16:15 +0200 From: Samuel Thibault To: Eduardo Habkost Subject: Re: Python 2 and test/vm/netbsd Message-ID: <20191022131615.ivlfwpct22zcjzde@function> References: <20191016030021.GD4084@habkost.net> <20191016224124.GF4084@habkost.net> <20191017220541.GJ4084@habkost.net> <20191017225548.GL4084@habkost.net> <20191018104439.c2tojlvi2c5zzesi@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20191018142940.GN4084@habkost.net> <20191018160019.he52tpvjqolzgswg@function> <20191018164143.GP4084@habkost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191018164143.GP4084@habkost.net> Organization: I am not organized User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.233.100.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , QEMU Developers , John Snow , Kamil Rytarowski , Gerd Hoffmann , Kevin Wolf , Cleber Rosa , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Eduardo Habkost, le ven. 18 oct. 2019 13:41:43 -0300, a ecrit: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 06:00:19PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > It was implemented at the time of introduction of IPv6 in SLIRP. Perhaps > > NetBSD has a slightly different behavior which makes the implementation > > fail to notice the error. > > If anybody is interested in investigating it, a network traffic > dump generated by `-object filter-dump` is attached. The dump does show the Destination Unreachable icmp message, so it seems it's the guest which does not notice it for some reason. Samuel