From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: cenjiahui <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhouyibo3@huawei.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, fangying1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] migration/multifd: fix potential wrong acception order of IOChannel
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:52:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024095227.GC3700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023033214.31592-3-cenjiahui@huawei.com>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:32:14AM +0800, cenjiahui wrote:
> From: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
>
> Multifd assumes the migration thread IOChannel is always established before
> the multifd IOChannels, but this assumption will be broken in many situations
> like network packet loss.
>
> For example:
> Step1: Source (migration thread IOChannel) --SYN--> Destination
> Step2: Source (migration thread IOChannel) <--SYNACK Destination
> Step3: Source (migration thread IOChannel, lost) --ACK-->X Destination
> Step4: Source (multifd IOChannel) --SYN--> Destination
> Step5: Source (multifd IOChannel) <--SYNACK Destination
> Step6: Source (multifd IOChannel, ESTABLISHED) --ACK--> Destination
> Step7: Destination accepts multifd IOChannel
> Step8: Source (migration thread IOChannel, ESTABLISHED) -ACK,DATA-> Destination
> Step9: Destination accepts migration thread IOChannel
>
> The above situation can be reproduced by creating a weak network environment,
> such as "tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem loss 50%". The wrong acception order
> will cause magic check failure and thus lead to migration failure.
>
> This patch fixes this issue by sending a migration IOChannel initial packet with
> a unique id when using multifd migration. Since the multifd IOChannels will also
> send initial packets, the destination can judge whether the processing IOChannel
> belongs to multifd by checking the id in the initial packet. This mechanism can
> ensure that different IOChannels will go to correct branches in our test.
Isn't this going to break back compatibility when new QEMU talks to old
QEMU with multifd enabled ? New QEMU will be sending a packet that old
QEMU isn't expecting IIUC.
> Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying1@huawei.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191023033214.31592-1-cenjiahui@huawei.com>
2019-10-23 3:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] migration/multifd: fix potential wrong acception order of IOChannel cenjiahui
2019-10-24 9:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-10-24 13:53 ` cenjiahui
2019-10-24 14:34 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-10-25 6:55 ` Jiahui Cen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024095227.GC3700@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cenjiahui@huawei.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=fangying1@huawei.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=zhouyibo3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).