From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09158C5DF60 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90482085B for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="LAPBIfkF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C90482085B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mvista.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlY5-0003qa-W9 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:26:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51611) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlXP-0003HF-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:25:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlXN-0005Be-Vg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:25:39 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-xc42.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c42]:39692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlXN-0005B9-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:25:37 -0500 Received: by mail-yw1-xc42.google.com with SMTP id d80so451123ywa.6 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:25:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=tK+EsN6zs3aDhv77AhMla1lU5UKC/kwH41zcMLcyUrg=; b=LAPBIfkFQ+emPFn0vBAQFUbaCYklfPSnKfJbCjamnzM7ts1k9TZxxLd0wVdTFLaOAX jg9iHSjPY70rOz93BDJIOIoIOIiwkokjqGa0D7OTO/L1EoCN2NbCBgM0/xDEKjahc9TQ kXAb4GkA+rWa/rQ2Ny9Tn/g1nXwea/Db5P/S5dN7yOOxlNHLnP8Y6tvc2A9qwCPP/ANm was/L15xtRqeLBIt5UdpWHEGdNSA43Z2hI8zU944VdfJHGQFK7jqSqC+5z1snshWMxIv rRpwtYD8bJksOipeU3ojW2hXuF/0YvEyKKHAqhx9MvZhRqPHxIjFcsLcIR4zQGmHdDSb YyAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tK+EsN6zs3aDhv77AhMla1lU5UKC/kwH41zcMLcyUrg=; b=U6n+R8KyU+ONcM1WoLqQfjc2u+3R8qtQ3m0sAJojYFp84xi96ZfpmPFXvZ0GaGkITj DwEwIhQ7wrfoXvm3knhrv1LnJ0EL4B6n28uuZyBOUJ4CSTGh7ToOZxIcv0UQbLrZBBWm 0IRE8cePAh/OYFYAdXpBdxbf4ZZjJLxtn//M+xxfla5gg+W2MbvIk7SJRTysOxdtf/Cg did06PHAaAKLX/KrBpAkHY0+pIMWPKzLHDyHoELve0T87qt+uVLFfU0QfDR8toCHVJOg vt865tG9cYiGzx8CcEN/x9OLNL07VCdw2FesqVF1etC1aGS6Xtjn2pS9Pvblyfyr2LIu AAZw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWKoWu64fN7DBPR6Cn5Y+JbO34ALWqVRcAwNO4yetaRxH/qtBiP BEtgyrCysz5LRAFahZWsqByt7iGT6rDcKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz2AOSqQ13YoCf1LGE1ymYNztB3t1hUPGVlZax5ARKfwh73OXV46mNhygr4qswNEtP1iBY2yA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1f4b:: with SMTP id u11mr2041670oth.60.1573147534822; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:25:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from minyard.net ([47.184.136.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u204sm879897oig.35.2019.11.07.09.25.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:25:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:25:32 -0600 From: Corey Minyard To: =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ipmi: Add support to customize OEM functions Message-ID: <20191107172532.GH10313@minyard.net> References: <20191021131215.3693-1-clg@kaod.org> <20191021131215.3693-3-clg@kaod.org> <20191021143017.GH25427@t560> <20191027174739.GN3552@umbus.metropole.lan> <20191027183347.GC2461@minyard.net> <20191107170025.GD2461@umbus.Home> <156e5bd5-726c-2db5-4b24-394d5ec0f268@kaod.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <156e5bd5-726c-2db5-4b24-394d5ec0f268@kaod.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::c42 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cminyard@mvista.com Cc: Greg Kurz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Joel Stanley , "Marty E . Plummer" , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:14:58PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > >>> What's the plan for merging this, once it's ready? Is there an IPMI > >>> tree for it to be staged in? If not I could take it through the ppc > >>> tree, but I'd need some Acked-bys in that case. > >> > >> I have an IPMI tree for this. I was assuming it was going in to the PPC > >> tree, but it's not big deal. > > > > I'd be more comfortable if the generic ipmi changes went through the > > ipmi tree. > > Here is the patch : > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1185187/ Ok, I have this in my tree. I assume there is nothing like the linux-next tree for qemu, right? -corey > > > > Note that I've moved the initial ppc specific patch from > > my ppc-for-4.2 tree to my ppc-for-4.3 tree, since it missed my > > previous pull request and it's not really post-freeze material. > > OK. I was wondering where it had gone. > > Thanks, > > C.