From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBB1C43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289432196E for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T5gs3IXM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 289432196E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35268 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUWcz-0006TE-J3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:54:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iUWWO-0003ru-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:47:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUWWN-00068P-0J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:47:52 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:52965 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iUWWM-0005qD-Mm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:47:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573566454; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RYLIFYQlGm9Ki6YHiQ6cr/ujzB2VBpC1BfYM0Iim6bA=; b=T5gs3IXM0rIlCcCwqVoTT3fxfphT9IDzAu5lpjrKz1S/Ont/MGqPVSQcjjX0cfoeZbDVG3 +OAETxwth7WuECnYXEmL9ike/D2ISd6i84TDiy1ohTfQps1c+95XtM04U3b2YJWBghw9bU 9HIdadj1fy1s+Ip19xWOTLQm365Rc+4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-274-zlx4a0vzMP2Ou6GrLn4HXA-1; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:47:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF3385EE6D; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-218.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.218]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE076106A; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:46:38 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6k=?= Lureau Subject: Re: [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err Message-ID: <20191112144638.4baf555a.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20191011160552.22907-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: zlx4a0vzMP2Ou6GrLn4HXA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg , Jeff Cody , Jan Kiszka , Alberto Garcia , Hailiang Zhang , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" , Aleksandar Rikalo , Halil Pasic , =?UTF-8?B?SGVydsOp?= Poussineau , Anthony Perard , Samuel Thibault , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= , Anthony Green , Laurent Vivier , Eduardo Habkost , Xie Changlong , Peter Lieven , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Beniamino Galvani , Eric Auger , Alex Williamson , Stefan Hajnoczi , John Snow , Richard Henderson , Kevin Wolf , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , Andrew Jeffery , Chris Wulff , Subbaraya Sundeep , Michael Walle , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , Bastian Koppelmann , Igor Mammedov , Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , "sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org" , Matthew Rosato , David Hildenbrand , Palmer Dabbelt , Eric Farman , Max Filippov , Hannes Reinecke , Stefano Stabellini , "Gonglei \(Arei\)" , Liu Yuan , Artyom Tarasenko , Thomas Huth , Amit Shah , Stefan Weil , Greg Kurz , Yuval Shaia , "qemu-s390x@nongnu.org" , "qemu-arm@nongnu.org" , Peter Chubb , =?UTF-8?B?Q8OpZHJpYw==?= Le Goater , Stafford Horne , "qemu-riscv@nongnu.org" , Aleksandar Markovic , Aurelien Jarno , Paul Burton , Sagar Karandikar , Paul Durrant , Jason Wang , Gerd Hoffmann , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Guan Xuetao , Ari Sundholm , Juan Quintela , Michael Roth , Christian Borntraeger , Joel Stanley , Jason Dillaman , Antony Pavlov , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , "integration@gluster.org" , Laszlo Ersek , "Richard W.M. Jones" , Andrew Baumann , Max Reitz , Denis Lunev , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Mark Cave-Ayland , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Vincenzo Maffione , Marek Vasut , "armbru@redhat.com" , Alistair Francis , Pavel Dovgalyuk , Giuseppe Lettieri , Luigi Rizzo , David Gibson , Tony Krowiak , "Daniel P. =?UTF-8?B?QmVycmFuZ8Op?=" , Xiao Guangrong , Pierre Morel , Wen Congyang , Jean-Christophe Dubois , Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Berger Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:57:25 +0400 Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi >=20 > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > wrote: > > > > Finally, what is the plan? > > > > Markus what do you think? > > > > Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not. > > > > Is there any hope that all patches will be reviewed? Should I resend th= e > > whole series, or may be reduce it to reviewed subsystems only? =20 >=20 > I don't think we have well established rules for whole-tree cleanups > like this. In the past, several cleanup series got lost. Yes, it is always problematic if a series touches a lot of different subsystems. >=20 > It will take ages to get every subsystem maintainer to review the > patches. Most likely, since they are quite systematic, there isn't > much to say and it is easy to miss something that has some hidden > ramifications. Perhaps whole-tree cleanups should require at least 2 > reviewers to bypass the subsytem maintainer review? But my past > experience with this kind of exercice doesn't encourage me, and > probably I am not the only one. It's not just the reviews; it's easy to miss compile problems on less mainstream architectures (and even easier to miss functional problems there, although they are probably less likely with automated rework.) CI can probably help, but that's something for the future. Anyway, I've now gotten around to that series; spotted one problem in s390x code, I think. One thing that's helpful for such a large series is a git branch that makes it easy to give the series a quick go. (You can use patchew, but it takes time before it gets all mails, so just pushing it somewhere and letting people know is a good idea anyway.)