From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B93AC432C3 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3D5206C0 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ALMuAjbD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DB3D5206C0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37528 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVYxS-00029N-0I for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:36:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVYwp-0001Xi-2G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:35:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVYwm-0002hU-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:35:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:48275 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVYwm-0002gc-Fk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:35:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573814123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xp+3mPnIe6Jgr36FirKPvyGuu++eZ0SjGE/i96JmlD8=; b=ALMuAjbDRPCHqsrjvh54cv6r/13KVn+qPrg+qsGqFvb0yU7Bg2d+PTkjFhkwdHrWc5db9u A1ha52I05lCt/47KUuL+6+NBfoThIVLR4IOs4SNc7j43wPxsPSNsdYiWj+7mAMmUA8sFBi 2BX9hG2cpkjvc8mmqhtzCYaGdVpDw20= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-132-WwzaNCBuPCOEYDuVUsBCsg-1; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:35:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F44107ACC4; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-218.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.218]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BE969185; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:35:12 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck To: Pierre Morel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390x: kvm-unit-tests: a PONG device for Sub Channels tests Message-ID: <20191115113512.2b9be20e.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2c10ed4f-2b9e-89e7-0e3e-704355523239@linux.ibm.com> References: <1573671753-15115-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20191114113823.5d752648.cohuck@redhat.com> <20191114140235.30a788d6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20191114141915.6dd5b9c8.cohuck@redhat.com> <2c10ed4f-2b9e-89e7-0e3e-704355523239@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-MC-Unique: WwzaNCBuPCOEYDuVUsBCsg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:42:35 +0100 Pierre Morel wrote: > On 2019-11-14 14:19, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:02:35 +0100 > > Halil Pasic wrote: > > =20 > >> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:38:23 +0100 > >> Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> =20 > >>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:02:33 +0100 > >>> Pierre Morel wrote: > >>> =20 > ...snip... > >> We made some different design decisions, while aiming essentially for = the > >> same. Maybe it's due to different scope, maybe not. For instance one > >> can't test IDA with PONG, I guess. =20 > > Now that I saw this again, I also recall the discussion of comparing it > > with the "testdev" for pci/isa. Anybody knows if these are used by > > kvm-unit-tests? =20 >=20 > Only by X. If they use it, it might make sense for s390 to use a comparable approach. Btw, I created https://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/CCWTestDevice back then; might make sense to collect ideas there? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Pierre >=20 >=20