From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-web] Add a blog post on "Micro-Optimizing KVM VM-Exits"
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:37:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115123754.GT7754@paraplu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8dce546-ea28-0619-a20a-62c762f99721@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 08/11/2019 10.22, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > This blog post summarizes the talk "Micro-Optimizing KVM VM-Exits"[1],
> > given by Andrea Arcangeli at the recently concluded KVM Forum 2019.
> >
>
> Hi Kashyap,
>
> first thanks for writing up this article! It's a really nice summary of
> the presentation, I think.
Hi Thomas,
Thanks!
> But before we include it, let me ask a meta-question: Is an article
> about the KVM *kernel* code suitable for the *QEMU* blog?
I had the same thought, and expressed it to Stefan as such, when he
suggested qemu.org :-). I too found it odd to have a kernel-heavy
article on qemu.org.
> Or is there
> maybe a better place for this, like an article on www.linux-kvm.org ?
I thought about it; but I've never seen anyone write an "article" there;
as it's a WikiSpace. And, like Paolo, I couldn't think of a better
place either.
FWIW, the qemu.org blog is indexed by a few blog "planet" aggregators;
and linux-kvm.org is largely a static site that is occasionally updated
by people if they happened to notice something (especially if it's
egregiously wrong).
> Opinions? Ideas?
Another _potential_ venue: Given the topic is kernel space-related, it
is likely to fit in with the LWN audience. LWN itself says they
generally look for kernel-related articles. Although, I'm aware that
there's already a few LWN articles being written on KVM Forum-based
talks. (Perhaps once the "KVM Monolithic" patch series merges, this can
be reworked into a standalone LWN kernel article — assuming LWN is
amenable to it; need to check with LWN.)
[...]
--
/kashyap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-08 9:22 [PATCH qemu-web] Add a blog post on "Micro-Optimizing KVM VM-Exits" Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-11-12 9:42 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-11-12 10:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-15 12:08 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-15 12:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-15 12:25 ` Alex Bennée
2019-11-15 12:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-15 12:37 ` Kashyap Chamarthy [this message]
2019-11-15 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-15 15:19 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-11-15 12:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-11-15 15:27 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115123754.GT7754@paraplu \
--to=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).