From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9FCC432C3 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4E820728 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hq47ISKZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E4E820728 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVawP-0000f7-JM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:43:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVarU-0005NL-LF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:38:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVarT-0005Xt-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:38:04 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:59021 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVarS-0005Xl-Ue for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:38:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573821482; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J+xU9O4D07OeJvTB/MKHLjjaJFT36XHcOvUi/1drsBw=; b=hq47ISKZR2gp2VLTH0cKf5tIcQY6x+F9YPle/Zy3PCaGngvivQ0LpTbONkQUJ4OQEbnXJe 58CY2r/UNwE3/pKTPvd+6Y5TJNXJv27n2O0bXCAepCjRX6yMW26aRlLZKsVtb9N7eaEjdk z7OuqDqM8j/cmIj+nmENNENUYr6nmZs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-206-f_rXev5sOn28nS7kUfiEDg-1; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:38:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38CD18B9FC1 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paraplu.localdomain (unknown [10.36.117.0]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6520C60C18; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by paraplu.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D4C3B3E0483; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:37:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:37:54 +0100 From: Kashyap Chamarthy To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-web] Add a blog post on "Micro-Optimizing KVM VM-Exits" Message-ID: <20191115123754.GT7754@paraplu> References: <20191108092247.16207-1-kchamart@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: f_rXev5sOn28nS7kUfiEDg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:08:53PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 08/11/2019 10.22, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > This blog post summarizes the talk "Micro-Optimizing KVM VM-Exits"[1], > > given by Andrea Arcangeli at the recently concluded KVM Forum 2019. > >=20 >=20 > Hi Kashyap, >=20 > first thanks for writing up this article! It's a really nice summary of > the presentation, I think. Hi Thomas, Thanks! > But before we include it, let me ask a meta-question: Is an article > about the KVM *kernel* code suitable for the *QEMU* blog?=20 I had the same thought, and expressed it to Stefan as such, when he suggested qemu.org :-). I too found it odd to have a kernel-heavy article on qemu.org. > Or is there > maybe a better place for this, like an article on www.linux-kvm.org ? I thought about it; but I've never seen anyone write an "article" there; as it's a WikiSpace. And, like Paolo, I couldn't think of a better place either. =20 FWIW, the qemu.org blog is indexed by a few blog "planet" aggregators; and linux-kvm.org is largely a static site that is occasionally updated by people if they happened to notice something (especially if it's egregiously wrong). > Opinions? Ideas? Another _potential_ venue: Given the topic is kernel space-related, it is likely to fit in with the LWN audience. LWN itself says they generally look for kernel-related articles. Although, I'm aware that there's already a few LWN articles being written on KVM Forum-based talks. (Perhaps once the "KVM Monolithic" patch series merges, this can be reworked into a standalone LWN kernel article =E2=80=94 assuming LWN is amenable to it; need to check with LWN.) [...] --=20 /kashyap