qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	wencongyang2@huawei.com, xiechanglong.d@gmail.com,
	armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com,
	crosa@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC 17/24] block/block-copy: add ratelimit to block-copy
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:14:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115141444.24155-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115141444.24155-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

We are going to directly use one async block-copy operation for backup
job, so we need rate limitator.

We want to maintain current backup behavior: only background copying is
limited and copy-before-write operations only participate in limit
calculation. Therefore we need one rate limitator for block-copy state
and boolean flag for block-copy call state for actual limitation.

Note, that we can't just calculate each chunk in limitator after
successful copying: it will not restring starting a lot of async
sub-requests which will exceed limit too much. Instead let's use the
following scheme on sub-request creation:
1. If at the moment limit is not exceeded, create the request and
account it immediately.
2. If at the moment limit is already exceeded, drop create sub-request
and handle limit instead (by sleep).
With this approach we'll never exceed the limit more than by one
sub-request (which pretty much matches current backup behavior).

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 include/block/block-copy.h |  8 +++++++
 block/block-copy.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
index 8fc27156b3..3f9cdc5eb2 100644
--- a/include/block/block-copy.h
+++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
@@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
                                      int64_t max_chunk,
                                      BlockCopyAsyncCallbackFunc cb);
 
+/*
+ * Set speed limit for block-copy instance. All block-copy operations related to
+ * this BlockCopyState will participate in speed calculation, but only
+ * block_copy_async calls with @ratelimit=true will be actually limited.
+ */
+void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
+                          uint64_t speed);
+
 BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
 void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
 
diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
index f28f3b8b6c..091bc044de 100644
--- a/block/block-copy.c
+++ b/block/block-copy.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #define BLOCK_COPY_MAX_BUFFER (1 * MiB)
 #define BLOCK_COPY_MAX_MEM (128 * MiB)
 #define BLOCK_COPY_MAX_WORKERS 64
+#define BLOCK_COPY_SLICE_TIME 100000000ULL /* ns */
 
 typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
     /* IN parameters */
@@ -34,11 +35,13 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
     int64_t bytes;
     int max_workers;
     int64_t max_chunk;
+    bool ratelimit;
     BlockCopyAsyncCallbackFunc cb;
 
     /* State */
     bool failed;
     bool finished;
+    QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
 
     /* OUT parameters */
     bool error_is_read;
@@ -101,6 +104,9 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyState {
     void *progress_opaque;
 
     SharedResource *mem;
+
+    uint64_t speed;
+    RateLimit rate_limit;
 } BlockCopyState;
 
 static BlockCopyTask *block_copy_find_task(BlockCopyState *s,
@@ -575,6 +581,21 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
         }
         task->zeroes = ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
 
+        if (s->speed) {
+            if (call_state->ratelimit) {
+                uint64_t ns = ratelimit_calculate_delay(&s->rate_limit, 0);
+                if (ns > 0) {
+                    block_copy_task_end(task, -EAGAIN);
+                    g_free(task);
+                    qemu_co_sleep_ns_wakeable(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME, ns,
+                                              &call_state->sleep_state);
+                    continue;
+                }
+            }
+
+            ratelimit_calculate_delay(&s->rate_limit, task->bytes);
+        }
+
         trace_block_copy_process(s, offset);
 
         co_get_from_shres(s->mem, task->bytes);
@@ -604,6 +625,13 @@ out:
     return ret < 0 ? ret : found_dirty;
 }
 
+static void block_copy_kick(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
+{
+    if (call_state->sleep_state) {
+        qemu_co_sleep_wake(call_state->sleep_state);
+    }
+}
+
 static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
 {
     int ret = 0;
@@ -688,6 +716,7 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
         .s = s,
         .offset = offset,
         .bytes = bytes,
+        .ratelimit = ratelimit,
         .cb = cb,
         .max_workers = max_workers ?: BLOCK_COPY_MAX_WORKERS,
         .max_chunk = max_chunk,
@@ -711,3 +740,18 @@ void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip)
 {
     s->skip_unallocated = skip;
 }
+
+void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
+                          uint64_t speed)
+{
+    uint64_t old_speed = s->speed;
+
+    s->speed = speed;
+    if (speed > 0) {
+        ratelimit_set_speed(&s->rate_limit, speed, BLOCK_COPY_SLICE_TIME);
+    }
+
+    if (call_state && old_speed && (speed > old_speed || speed == 0)) {
+        block_copy_kick(call_state);
+    }
+}
-- 
2.21.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-15 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-15 14:14 [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 01/24] block/block-copy: specialcase first copy_range request Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 02/24] block/block-copy: use block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 03/24] block/block-copy: factor out block_copy_find_inflight_req Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 04/24] block/block-copy: refactor interfaces to use bytes instead of end Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 05/24] block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 06/24] block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 07/24] block/block-copy: hide structure definitions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 08/24] block/block-copy: rename in-flight requests to tasks Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 09/24] block/block-copy: alloc task on each iteration Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 10/24] block/block-copy: add state pointer to BlockCopyTask Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 11/24] block/block-copy: move task size initial calculation to _task_create Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 12/24] block/block-copy: move block_copy_task_create down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 13/24] block/block-copy: use aio-task-pool API Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 14/24] block/block-copy: More explicit call_state Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 15/24] block/block-copy: implement block_copy_async Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 16/24] block/block-copy: add max_chunk and max_workers paramters Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 18/24] block/block-copy: add block_copy_cancel Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 19/24] blockjob: add set_speed to BlockJobDriver Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 20/24] job: call job_enter from job_user_pause Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 21/24] backup: move to block-copy Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 17:58   ` Eric Blake
2019-11-16  9:28     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 22/24] python: add simplebench.py Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 23/24] python: add qemu/bench_block_job.py Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 24/24] python: benchmark new backup architecture Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 17:30 ` [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async no-reply
2019-11-15 17:33   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191115141444.24155-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).