From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, ehabkost@redhat.com,
wencongyang2@huawei.com, xiechanglong.d@gmail.com,
armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com,
crosa@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC 04/24] block/block-copy: refactor interfaces to use bytes instead of end
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:14:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115141444.24155-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115141444.24155-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
We have a lot of "chunk_end - start" invocations, let's switch to
bytes/cur_bytes scheme instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/block/block-copy.h | 4 +--
block/block-copy.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
index 0a161724d7..7321b3d305 100644
--- a/include/block/block-copy.h
+++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
#include "qemu/co-shared-resource.h"
typedef struct BlockCopyInFlightReq {
- int64_t start_byte;
- int64_t end_byte;
+ int64_t start;
+ int64_t bytes;
QLIST_ENTRY(BlockCopyInFlightReq) list;
CoQueue wait_queue; /* coroutines blocked on this request */
} BlockCopyInFlightReq;
diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
index 94e7e855ef..cc273b6cb8 100644
--- a/block/block-copy.c
+++ b/block/block-copy.c
@@ -26,12 +26,12 @@
static BlockCopyInFlightReq *block_copy_find_inflight_req(BlockCopyState *s,
int64_t start,
- int64_t end)
+ int64_t bytes)
{
BlockCopyInFlightReq *req;
QLIST_FOREACH(req, &s->inflight_reqs, list) {
- if (end > req->start_byte && start < req->end_byte) {
+ if (start + bytes > req->start && start < req->start + req->bytes) {
return req;
}
}
@@ -41,21 +41,21 @@ static BlockCopyInFlightReq *block_copy_find_inflight_req(BlockCopyState *s,
static void coroutine_fn block_copy_wait_inflight_reqs(BlockCopyState *s,
int64_t start,
- int64_t end)
+ int64_t bytes)
{
BlockCopyInFlightReq *req;
- while ((req = block_copy_find_inflight_req(s, start, end))) {
+ while ((req = block_copy_find_inflight_req(s, start, bytes))) {
qemu_co_queue_wait(&req->wait_queue, NULL);
}
}
static void block_copy_inflight_req_begin(BlockCopyState *s,
BlockCopyInFlightReq *req,
- int64_t start, int64_t end)
+ int64_t start, int64_t bytes)
{
- req->start_byte = start;
- req->end_byte = end;
+ req->start = start;
+ req->bytes = bytes;
qemu_co_queue_init(&req->wait_queue);
QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s->inflight_reqs, req, list);
}
@@ -150,24 +150,26 @@ void block_copy_set_callbacks(
/*
* block_copy_do_copy
*
- * Do copy of cluser-aligned chunk. @end is allowed to exceed s->len only to
- * cover last cluster when s->len is not aligned to clusters.
+ * Do copy of cluser-aligned chunk. Requested region is allowed to exceed s->len
+ * only to cover last cluster when s->len is not aligned to clusters.
*
* No sync here: nor bitmap neighter intersecting requests handling, only copy.
*
* Returns 0 on success.
*/
static int coroutine_fn block_copy_do_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
- int64_t start, int64_t end,
+ int64_t start, int64_t bytes,
bool zeroes, bool *error_is_read)
{
int ret;
- int nbytes = MIN(end, s->len) - start;
+ int nbytes = MIN(start + bytes, s->len) - start;
void *bounce_buffer = NULL;
+ assert(start >= 0 && bytes > 0 && INT64_MAX - start >= bytes);
assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(start, s->cluster_size));
- assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(end, s->cluster_size));
- assert(end < s->len || end == QEMU_ALIGN_UP(s->len, s->cluster_size));
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
+ assert(start + bytes <= s->len ||
+ start + bytes == QEMU_ALIGN_UP(s->len, s->cluster_size));
if (zeroes) {
ret = bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(s->target, start, nbytes, s->write_flags &
@@ -347,7 +349,6 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
bool *error_is_read)
{
int ret = 0;
- int64_t end = bytes + start; /* bytes */
BlockCopyInFlightReq req;
/*
@@ -358,58 +359,59 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
bdrv_get_aio_context(s->target->bs));
assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(start, s->cluster_size));
- assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(end, s->cluster_size));
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
block_copy_wait_inflight_reqs(s, start, bytes);
- block_copy_inflight_req_begin(s, &req, start, end);
+ block_copy_inflight_req_begin(s, &req, start, bytes);
- while (start < end) {
- int64_t next_zero, chunk_end, status_bytes;
+ while (bytes) {
+ int64_t next_zero, cur_bytes, status_bytes;
if (!bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get(s->copy_bitmap, start)) {
trace_block_copy_skip(s, start);
start += s->cluster_size;
+ bytes -= s->cluster_size;
continue; /* already copied */
}
- chunk_end = MIN(end, start + s->copy_size);
+ cur_bytes = MIN(bytes, s->copy_size);
next_zero = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(s->copy_bitmap, start,
- chunk_end - start);
+ cur_bytes);
if (next_zero >= 0) {
assert(next_zero > start); /* start is dirty */
- assert(next_zero < chunk_end); /* no need to do MIN() */
- chunk_end = next_zero;
+ assert(next_zero < start + cur_bytes); /* no need to do MIN() */
+ cur_bytes = next_zero - start;
}
- ret = block_copy_block_status(s, start, chunk_end - start,
- &status_bytes);
+ ret = block_copy_block_status(s, start, cur_bytes, &status_bytes);
if (s->skip_unallocated && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED)) {
bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, status_bytes);
s->progress_reset_callback(s->progress_opaque);
trace_block_copy_skip_range(s, start, status_bytes);
start += status_bytes;
+ bytes -= status_bytes;
continue;
}
- chunk_end = MIN(chunk_end, start + status_bytes);
+ cur_bytes = MIN(cur_bytes, status_bytes);
trace_block_copy_process(s, start);
- bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, chunk_end - start);
+ bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, cur_bytes);
- co_get_from_shres(s->mem, chunk_end - start);
- ret = block_copy_do_copy(s, start, chunk_end, ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO,
+ co_get_from_shres(s->mem, cur_bytes);
+ ret = block_copy_do_copy(s, start, cur_bytes, ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO,
error_is_read);
- co_put_to_shres(s->mem, chunk_end - start);
+ co_put_to_shres(s->mem, cur_bytes);
if (ret < 0) {
- bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, chunk_end - start);
+ bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, cur_bytes);
break;
}
- s->progress_bytes_callback(chunk_end - start, s->progress_opaque);
- start = chunk_end;
- ret = 0;
+ s->progress_bytes_callback(cur_bytes, s->progress_opaque);
+ start += cur_bytes;
+ bytes -= cur_bytes;
}
block_copy_inflight_req_end(&req);
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 14:14 [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 01/24] block/block-copy: specialcase first copy_range request Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 02/24] block/block-copy: use block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 03/24] block/block-copy: factor out block_copy_find_inflight_req Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 05/24] block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 06/24] block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 07/24] block/block-copy: hide structure definitions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 08/24] block/block-copy: rename in-flight requests to tasks Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 09/24] block/block-copy: alloc task on each iteration Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 10/24] block/block-copy: add state pointer to BlockCopyTask Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 11/24] block/block-copy: move task size initial calculation to _task_create Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 12/24] block/block-copy: move block_copy_task_create down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 13/24] block/block-copy: use aio-task-pool API Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 14/24] block/block-copy: More explicit call_state Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 15/24] block/block-copy: implement block_copy_async Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 16/24] block/block-copy: add max_chunk and max_workers paramters Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 17/24] block/block-copy: add ratelimit to block-copy Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 18/24] block/block-copy: add block_copy_cancel Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 19/24] blockjob: add set_speed to BlockJobDriver Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 20/24] job: call job_enter from job_user_pause Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 21/24] backup: move to block-copy Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 17:58 ` Eric Blake
2019-11-16 9:28 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 22/24] python: add simplebench.py Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 23/24] python: add qemu/bench_block_job.py Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 14:14 ` [RFC 24/24] python: benchmark new backup architecture Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-11-15 17:30 ` [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async no-reply
2019-11-15 17:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115141444.24155-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wencongyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=xiechanglong.d@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).