From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476B9C432C0 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C15020708 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C15020708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXDye-0002Zp-7c for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:36:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXDxj-00023d-So for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:35:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXDxi-0004ZY-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:35:15 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:2632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXDxi-0004UT-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:35:14 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2019 16:35:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,219,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="200540395" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2019 16:35:10 -0800 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:35:00 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Juan Quintela Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy Message-ID: <20191120003500.GA11061@richard> References: <20191025232000.25857-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20191025232000.25857-3-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <87d0dogmo7.fsf@trasno.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d0dogmo7.fsf@trasno.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.55.52.136 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wei Yang , dgilbert@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:55:52AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: >Wei Yang wrote: >> We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable >> both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure. >> >> Skip multifd during postcopy. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang > >Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela > >I was working in a different implementation, but I agree with the idea. > >My patch series try to decide during negotiation if multifd + everything >else is setup or not. > Look forward your approach :-) >Thanks, Juan. -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me