From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D5AC432C0 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D22207DD for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:36:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 24D22207DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=virtuozzo.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia2Ax-0006JJ-37 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:36:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia1kA-0006dh-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:08:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia1k9-0003sW-Jr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:08:50 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:49992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia1k6-0003iq-7B; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:08:46 -0500 Received: from vovaso.qa.sw.ru ([10.94.3.0] helo=kvm.qa.sw.ru) by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ia1k0-0002UU-CF; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:08:40 +0300 From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 for-5.0 0/7] block-copy improvements: part I Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:08:33 +0300 Message-Id: <20191127180840.11937-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.231.240.75 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, jsnow@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi all! This is a first part of my [RFC 00/24] backup performance: block_status + async Patches are mostly separate by their idea, but sending them all in separate is inefficient. Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (7): block/block-copy: specialcase first copy_range request block/block-copy: use block_status block/block-copy: factor out block_copy_find_inflight_req block/block-copy: refactor interfaces to use bytes instead of end block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces block/block-copy: reduce intersecting request lock block/block-copy: hide structure definitions include/block/block-copy.h | 57 +----- block/backup-top.c | 6 +- block/backup.c | 27 +-- block/block-copy.c | 379 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- block/trace-events | 1 + 5 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-) -- 2.21.0