Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390x: Increase architectural compliance

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:20:22 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On a diag 308 subcode 0 and 1 we need to load the whole reset PSW and
> not just the address.
> 
> On a cpu reset normal, we need to clear local cpus. Unfortunately we
> need a new API for that, since KVM only exposes one of the three
> resets.
> 
> Patches are also in my cleanup branch.
> 
> Janosch Frank (3):
>   s390x: Properly fetch and test the short psw on diag308 subc 0/1
>   Sync reset
>   s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions
> 
>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h |  7 +++++++
>  target/s390x/cpu.c        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  target/s390x/cpu.h        |  1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm-stub.c   | 10 +++++++++-
>  target/s390x/kvm.c        | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h  |  4 +++-
>  6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

Ok, it seems I should just go ahead and pick patch 1, and defer the
remainder until after we agree on the interface, right?