From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, berrange@redhat.com,
ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
mark.burton@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
edgari@xilinx.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
philmd@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] hw/core: create Resettable QOM interface
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 12:16:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191203121630.279e68e3.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018150630.31099-4-damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:06:20 +0200
Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com> wrote:
> This commit defines an interface allowing multi-phase reset. This aims
> to solve a problem of the actual single-phase reset (built in
> DeviceClass and BusClass): reset behavior is dependent on the order
> in which reset handlers are called. In particular doing external
> side-effect (like setting an qemu_irq) is problematic because receiving
> object may not be reset yet.
>
> The Resettable interface divides the reset in 3 well defined phases.
> To reset an object tree, all 1st phases are executed then all 2nd then
> all 3rd. See the comments in include/hw/resettable.h for a more complete
> description. The interface defines 3 phases to let the future
> possibility of holding an object into reset for some time.
>
> The qdev/qbus reset in DeviceClass and BusClass will be modified in
> following commits to use this interface. A mechanism is provided
> to allow executing a transitional reset handler in place of the 2nd
> phase which is executed in children-then-parent order inside a tree.
> This will allow to transition devices and buses smoothly while
> keeping the exact current qdev/qbus reset behavior for now.
>
> Documentation will be added in a following commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
> ---
>
> In this patch only a single reset type is supported, but the interface
> allows for more to be defined.
>
> I had some thought about problems which may arise when having multiple
> reset types:
>
> - reset type propagation. Right now we propagate the same reset type
> to the children. I don't think it will work that with multiple
> types.
> For example, if we add pci_bus_reset type: a pci device will
> implement the reset type but not its children (they may have
> nothing to do with pci).
> This can be solved by changing the child_foreach method rules.
> We should say that child_foreach may change the type it
> propagates to its children (on a children by children basis).
> For example, the pci device may just propagate cold reset type
> to its children.
> For this we need to pass the type as parameter to child_foreach()
> method.
>
> - are all children concerned ? For a given reset type, some child
> may not need to be reset. As above we can handle that with
> child_foreach: an resettable object can propagate the reset only
> to a partial set of its child.
> For this we need to know the type when we release the reset,
> that's why I added it to resettable_release_reset() even if it
> is unused right now.
> I've also added an opaque parameter to child_foreach. I think
> we will need that to handle the change of parent because we
> will need to test if a child is concerned by a reset type: the
> opaque will allow to use a test callback and get some result.
What about an optional ->filter() callback? That would be invoked if
existing prior to calling the child_foreach callback and could be used
to exclude children from the reset for this round for all callbacks. Or
have it modify the reset type (like in your pci reset -> cold reset
example above), and completely skip it if the reset type has been
modified to a 'no reset' type?
>
> - several reset types at the same time. I don't another solution
> than saying we execute *enter* and *hold* phase for every reset
> type. *exit* will still be executed once for all at the end.
> It will be up for each object to cope with it if it handle
> multiple reset types. For *enter* is trivial, calling it twice
> in a row is no problem given that it should only reset internal
> state. For *hold* there may be some complication.
>
> - Obviously we will need to at least an interface class field to hold
> the supported reset types by the class. Also the reset state will
> need some modification.
> ---
> Makefile.objs | 1 +
> hw/core/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> hw/core/resettable.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/core/trace-events | 17 +++
> include/hw/resettable.h | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 448 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/core/resettable.c
> create mode 100644 include/hw/resettable.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-03 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 15:06 [PATCH v5 00/13] Multi-phase reset mechanism Damien Hedde
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] add device_legacy_reset function to prepare for reset api change Damien Hedde
2019-10-19 17:35 ` Richard Henderson
2019-12-03 10:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] hw/core/qdev: add trace events to help with resettable transition Damien Hedde
2019-10-19 17:44 ` Richard Henderson
2019-10-31 23:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-11-04 12:16 ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-04 14:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-03 10:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] hw/core: create Resettable QOM interface Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 18:32 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 11:07 ` Damien Hedde
2019-12-02 11:14 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 11:16 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] hw/core: add Resettable support to BusClass and DeviceClass Damien Hedde
2019-10-19 18:49 ` Richard Henderson
2019-11-29 18:36 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 11:38 ` Damien Hedde
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] hw/core/resettable: add support for changing parent Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 18:38 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 11:43 ` Damien Hedde
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] hw/core/qdev: handle parent bus change regarding resettable Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 18:41 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 11:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] hw/core/qdev: update hotplug reset " Damien Hedde
2019-11-08 15:14 ` Damien Hedde
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] hw/core: deprecate old reset functions and introduce new ones Damien Hedde
2019-10-31 23:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-11-04 12:01 ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-04 15:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-11-29 18:42 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] docs/devel/reset.txt: add doc about Resettable interface Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 19:00 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-06 15:40 ` Damien Hedde
2019-12-06 16:21 ` Damien Hedde
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] vl: replace deprecated qbus_reset_all registration Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 19:01 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] hw/s390x/ipl: replace deprecated qdev_reset_all registration Damien Hedde
2019-10-31 23:38 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-11-29 19:02 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 11:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] hw/gpio/bcm2835_gpio: Isolate sdbus reparenting Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 19:05 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 12:27 ` Damien Hedde
2019-12-02 12:33 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 13:05 ` Damien Hedde
2019-12-02 13:10 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-18 15:06 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] hw/gpio/bcm2835_gpio: Update to resettable Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 19:02 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-19 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] Multi-phase reset mechanism no-reply
2019-10-29 15:53 ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-08 15:26 ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-08 15:28 ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-08 15:58 ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 19:07 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 11:44 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191203121630.279e68e3.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=damien.hedde@greensocs.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=edgari@xilinx.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.burton@greensocs.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).