From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9462FC2D0B1 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7EF20726 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:51:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D7EF20726 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieWYr-0001On-Et for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:51:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieWXz-0000J8-O1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:50:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieWXy-00076A-D3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:50:51 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:63880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieWXy-00075F-4q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:50:50 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBA3gQZ2070129 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:50:48 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wsu3nqjxx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:50:48 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:46 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:43 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xBA3ogF136044826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:42 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6939411C04C; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1B211C052; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from in.ibm.com (unknown [9.199.37.168]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 03:50:41 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:20:38 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao To: David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 ppc-for-5.0 2/2] ppc/spapr: Support reboot of secure pseries guest References: <20191209070012.14766-1-bharata@linux.ibm.com> <20191209070012.14766-3-bharata@linux.ibm.com> <20191210032851.GC207300@umbus.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191210032851.GC207300@umbus.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19121003-0008-0000-0000-0000033F515C X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19121003-0009-0000-0000-00004A5E8094 Message-Id: <20191210035038.GB17552@in.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-09_05:2019-12-09,2019-12-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912100033 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.163.156.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: bharata@linux.ibm.com Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:28:51PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:30:12PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > > A pseries guest can be run as a secure guest on Ultravisor-enabled > > POWER platforms. When such a secure guest is reset, we need to > > release/reset a few resources both on ultravisor and hypervisor side. > > This is achieved by invoking this new ioctl KVM_PPC_SVM_OFF from the > > machine reset path. > > > > As part of this ioctl, the secure guest is essentially transitioned > > back to normal mode so that it can reboot like a regular guest and > > become secure again. > > > > This ioctl has no effect when invoked for a normal guest. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao > > --- > > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 1 + > > target/ppc/kvm.c | 7 +++++++ > > target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 6 ++++++ > > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > > index f11422fc41..4c7ad3400d 100644 > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > > @@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_reset(MachineState *machine) > > void *fdt; > > int rc; > > > > + kvmppc_svm_off(); > > If you're going to have this return an error value, you should really > check it here. I could, by spapr_machine_reset() and the callers don't propagate the errors up. So may be I could print a warning instead when ioctl fails? Regards, Bharata.