From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: ning.bo9@zte.com.cn
Cc: mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event when setrunning
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:05:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212110525.GA1141992@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201911281926474453744@zte.com.cn>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4597 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 07:26:47PM +0800, ning.bo9@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Let me describe the issue with an example via `nc-vsock`:
>
> Let's assume the Guest cid is 3.
> execute 'rmmod vmw_vsock_virtio_transport' in Guest,
> then execute 'while true; do nc-vsock 3 1234' in Host.
>
> Host Guest
> # rmmod vmw_vsock_virtio_transport
>
> # while true; do ./nc-vsock 3 1234; done
> (after 2 second)
> connect: Connection timed out
> (after 2 second)
> connect: Connection timed out
> ...
>
> # modprobe vmw_vsock_virtio_transport
>
> connect: Connection reset by peer
> connect: Connection reset by peer
> connect: Connection reset by peer
> ...
>
> # nc-vsock -l 1234
> Connetion from cid 2 port ***...
> (stop printing)
>
>
> The above process simulates the communication process between
> the `kata-runtime` and `kata-agent` after starting the Guest.
> In order to connect to `kata-agent` as soon as possible,
> `kata-runtime` will continuously try to connect to `kata-agent` in a loop.
> see https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/blob/d054556f60f092335a22a288011fa29539ad4ccc/vendor/github.com/kata-containers/agent/protocols/client/client.go#L327
> But when the vsock device in the Guest is not ready, the connection
> will block for 2 seconds. This situation actually slows down
> the entire startup time of `kata-runtime`.
This can be done efficiently as follows:
1. kata-runtime listens on a vsock port
2. kata-agent-port=PORT is added to the kernel command-line options
3. kata-agent parses the port number and connects to the host
This eliminates the reconnection attempts.
> > I think that adding a QMP event is working around the issue rather than
> > fixing the root cause. This is probably a vhost_vsock.ko problem and
> > should be fixed there.
>
> After looking at the source code of vhost_vsock.ko,
> I think it is possible to optimize the logic here too.
> The simple patch is as follows. Do you think the modification is appropriate?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 9f57736f..8fad67be 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct vhost_vsock {
> atomic_t queued_replies;
>
> u32 guest_cid;
> + u32 state;
> };
>
> static u32 vhost_transport_get_local_cid(void)
> @@ -497,6 +541,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_start(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
>
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> }
> + vsock->state = 1;
>
> mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> return 0;
> @@ -535,6 +580,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
> vq->private_data = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> }
> + vsock->state = 0;
>
> err:
> mutex_unlock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
> @@ -786,6 +832,27 @@ static struct miscdevice vhost_vsock_misc = {
> .fops = &vhost_vsock_fops,
> };
>
> +int vhost_transport_connect(struct vsock_sock *vsk) {
> + struct vhost_vsock *vsock;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + /* Find the vhost_vsock according to guest context id */
> + vsock = vhost_vsock_get(vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid);
> + if (!vsock) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (vsock->state == 1) {
> + return virtio_transport_connect(vsk);
> + } else {
> + return -ECONNRESET;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> .transport = {
> .get_local_cid = vhost_transport_get_local_cid,
> @@ -793,7 +860,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> .init = virtio_transport_do_socket_init,
> .destruct = virtio_transport_destruct,
> .release = virtio_transport_release,
> - .connect = virtio_transport_connect,
> + .connect = vhost_transport_connect,
> .shutdown = virtio_transport_shutdown,
> .cancel_pkt = vhost_transport_cancel_pkt,
I'm not keen on adding a special case for vhost_vsock.ko connect.
Userspace APIs to avoid the 2 second wait already exist:
1. The SO_VM_SOCKETS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT socket option controls the connect
timeout for this socket.
2. Non-blocking connect allows the userspace process to do other things
while a connection attempt is being made.
But the best solution is the one I mentioned above.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-05 3:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event when set running Ning Bo
2019-08-09 13:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-28 11:26 ` Re:[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event when setrunning ning.bo9
2019-12-12 11:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-12-12 11:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-12-19 11:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-12-13 7:11 ` Re:[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event whensetrunning ning.bo9
2019-12-19 11:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-12-20 2:38 ` Re:[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP eventwhensetrunning ning.bo9
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191212110525.GA1141992@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ning.bo9@zte.com.cn \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).