From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iotests.py: Let wait_migration wait even more
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:07:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191220100722.GC4019@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae410084-8100-de49-4576-d13da3f6adee@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2287 bytes --]
Am 20.12.2019 um 10:52 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> On 20.12.19 10:32, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 19.12.2019 um 19:36 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> >> The "migration completed" event may be sent (on the source, to be
> >> specific) before the migration is actually completed, so the VM runstate
> >> will still be "finish-migrate" instead of "postmigrate". So ask the
> >> users of VM.wait_migration() to specify the final runstate they desire
> >> and then poll the VM until it has reached that state. (This should be
> >> over very quickly, so busy polling is fine.)
> >>
> >> Without this patch, I see intermittent failures in the new iotest 280
> >> under high system load. I have not yet seen such failures with other
> >> iotests that use VM.wait_migration() and query-status afterwards, but
> >> maybe they just occur even more rarely, or it is because they also wait
> >> on the destination VM to be running.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> >
> >> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> >> index 13fd8b5cd2..0b62c42851 100644
> >> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> >> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> >> @@ -668,12 +668,16 @@ class VM(qtest.QEMUQtestMachine):
> >> }
> >> ]))
> >>
> >> - def wait_migration(self):
> >> + def wait_migration(self, expect_runstate):
> >> while True:
> >> event = self.event_wait('MIGRATION')
> >> log(event, filters=[filter_qmp_event])
> >> if event['data']['status'] == 'completed':
> >> break
> >> + # The event may occur in finish-migrate, so wait for the expected
> >> + # post-migration runstate
> >
> > That's a bit too specific now that you have expect_runstate.
>
> Can you be more specific? :-)
>
> If you mean the fact of mentioning “post-migration runstate”, I simply
> meant that as “the runstate after the migration”. The specific runstate
> on the source VM is called “postmigrate”.
Oh, yes, "postmigrate" is what I had in mind.
> I wouldn’t mind changing it to “after-migration runstate” or something
> similar, if that’s what you mean.
"runstate after migration"?
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-20 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-19 18:36 [PATCH v2] iotests.py: Let wait_migration wait even more Max Reitz
2019-12-20 9:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-12-20 9:52 ` Max Reitz
2019-12-20 10:07 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-12-20 10:18 ` Max Reitz
2019-12-23 23:15 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191220100722.GC4019@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).