From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: den@virtuozzo.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rkagan@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] virtio-pci: store virtqueue size directly to a device
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:31:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191223093029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191223113758.11951-1-dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:37:58PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> Currenly, the virtqueue size is saved to the proxy on pci writing and
> is read from the device pci reading.
> The virtqueue size is propagated later on form the proxy to the device
> on virqueue enabling stage.
>
> This could be a problem, if a guest, on the virtqueue configuration, sets
> the size and then re-read it immediatly before the queue enabling
> in order to check if the desiged size has been set.
>
> This happens in seabios: (sebios snippet)
>
> vp_find_vq()
> {
> ...
> /* check if the queue is available */
> if (vp->use_modern) {
> num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
> if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
> vp_write(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size,
> MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
> num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
> }
> } else {
> num = vp_read(&vp->legacy, virtio_pci_legacy, queue_num);
> }
> if (!num) {
> dprintf(1, "ERROR: queue size is 0\n");
> goto fail;
> }
> if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
> dprintf(1, "ERROR: queue size %d > %d\n", num, MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
> goto fail;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> If the device queue num is greater then the max queue size supported by seabios,
> seabios tries to reduce the queue size, then re-read it again, I suppose to
> check if the setting actually happens, and then checks the virtqueue size again,
> to deside whether it is satisfied with the vaule.
> In this case, if device's virtqueue size is 512 and seabios max supported queue
> size is 256, seabios tries to set 256 but than read 512 again and can't proceed
> with that vaule, preventing the guest from successful booting.
> The root case was investigated by Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
>
> The patch fixes the problem, by propagating the queue size to the device right
> away, so the written value could be read on the next step, if the value was
> ok for the device.
>
> Suggested-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>
Thanks, I already have this queued as:
commit 8aabbbd9d04f95d5581d2275362996ecb5516dd9
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Dec 13 09:22:48 2019 -0500
virtio: update queue size on guest write
Some guests read back queue size after writing it.
Update the size immediatly upon write otherwise
they get confused.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
I would appreciate checking other transports, they likely
need the same fix.
> ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index c6b47a9c73..e5c759e19e 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -1256,6 +1256,8 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> break;
> case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE:
> proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num = val;
> + virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
> + proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num);
> break;
> case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_MSIX:
> msix_vector_unuse(&proxy->pci_dev,
> --
> 2.17.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-23 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-23 11:37 [PATCH v1] virtio-pci: store virtqueue size directly to a device Denis Plotnikov
2019-12-23 14:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-12-24 7:54 ` Denis Plotnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191223093029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).