Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio: Change order of appling runstate to device and bus

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:52:45PM +0300, Anton Kuchin wrote:
> On transition to running first apply state to bus and then to device
> so device can access bus functions correctly. When going to stopped
> notify device first and then the bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Kuchin <antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>

I kind of like this but this has the potential to break lots of things.
How was this tested?

> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 04716b5f6c..2ea2edba10 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -3096,7 +3096,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
>      bool backend_run = running && virtio_device_started(vdev, vdev->status);
>      vdev->vm_running = running;
>  
> -    if (backend_run) {
> +    if (!backend_run) {
>          virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
>      }
>  
> @@ -3104,7 +3104,7 @@ static void virtio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state)
>          k->vmstate_change(qbus->parent, backend_run);
>      }
>  
> -    if (!backend_run) {
> +    if (backend_run) {
>          virtio_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
>      }
>  }
> -- 
> 2.20.1