Re: [PATCH] docs/devel: fix stable process doc formatting

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:30:23 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> Enumeration of stable criteria needs proper bullet points.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/devel/stable-process.rst | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> index 98736a9ea487..e541b983fac7 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> @@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ What should go into a stable release?
>  -------------------------------------
>  
>  Generally, the following patches are considered stable material:
> -- Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
> -- Patches that fix regressions
> +
> +* Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
> +
> +* Patches that fix regressions
>  
>  If you think the patch would be important for users of the current release
>  (or for a distribution picking fixes), it is usually a good candidate

Queued to s390-next, so that it doesn't fall through the cracks.