From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45571C2D0DB for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:08:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D9924655 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QHVtPoXC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 15D9924655 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLMX-0008EK-4w for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:08:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLLv-0007nT-K6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLLu-0003JL-FR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:47 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:60997 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iuLLu-0003J2-Bp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579720066; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uA80p9UWUlXMQ4ViKABxamnob6bF4ALQ6YnD5m3DbUc=; b=QHVtPoXCGDKz0FbdDFwetczaP0HEZKX9guEbqfCULdj55ewP4Joe289RaOb3RTTNIG8DRp JRG//l8fEFcOT/HvDfoM+W2zjm1jvsWKSmKx8hSZI6Oo63pOvcnnis1wX9gcRYjSWPMkqc xStQT1h5poMtcvyx4h4CE+3365PokI8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-197-EiZi17r7MFeDRLdf4PIO0g-1; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:07:43 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E29D8017CC; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-116-49.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.49]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417AA60C84; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:07:38 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck To: Alex =?UTF-8?B?QmVubsOpZQ==?= Subject: Re: Maintainers, please add Message-Id: when merging patches Message-ID: <20200122200738.7be66e3e.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87k15jz5e8.fsf@linaro.org> References: <87v9p3znas.fsf@linaro.org> <9ac75d71-731d-a9d8-4ba6-f394077c4d96@redhat.com> <87k15jz5e8.fsf@linaro.org> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: EiZi17r7MFeDRLdf4PIO0g-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:56:47 +0000 Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > Laszlo Ersek writes: >=20 > > On 01/22/20 13:30, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: =20 > >>=20 > >> Stefan Hajnoczi writes: > >> =20 > >>> Around 66% of qemu.git commits since v4.1.0 include a Message-Id: tag= . Hooray! > >>> > >>> Message-Id: references the patch email that a commit was merged from. > >>> This information is helpful to anyone wishing to refer back to email > >>> discussions and patch series. =20 > >>=20 > >> So I guess the ones that don't are maintainer originated patches unles= s > >> you actively rebuild your trees from a posted series? =20 > > > > I *think* this should not be a huge problem process wise: > > > > Assuming that a maintainer does not include their own patches in a PULL > > request for Peter until the same patches receive R-b/A-b/T-b feedback > > from other list subscribers, the maintainer will want to rebase the > > patches at least once anyway, in order to pick up those lines. =20 >=20 > Oh I always do a re-base as I apply the r-b/t-b tags. But that is > working off my tree and a bunch of references to the emails with the > appropriate tags in them. >=20 > So which Message-Id should I use. The first time the patch was posted to > the list or the last time it was? >From the last one? I mean, I'll pick the last incarnation if I apply someone else's patches, as well? [I just add the id right before I send my 'queued' email.]