qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 38/41] target/arm: Move arm_excp_unmasked to cpu.c
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2020 10:54:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206105448.4726-39-richard.henderson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206105448.4726-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>

This inline function has one user in cpu.c, and need not be exposed
otherwise.  Code movement only, with fixups for checkpatch.

Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/arm/cpu.h | 111 -------------------------------------------
 target/arm/cpu.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 2ed2667a17..0b3036c484 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -2709,117 +2709,6 @@ bool write_cpustate_to_list(ARMCPU *cpu, bool kvm_sync);
 #define ARM_CPUID_TI915T      0x54029152
 #define ARM_CPUID_TI925T      0x54029252
 
-static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx,
-                                     unsigned int target_el)
-{
-    CPUARMState *env = cs->env_ptr;
-    unsigned int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
-    bool secure = arm_is_secure(env);
-    bool pstate_unmasked;
-    int8_t unmasked = 0;
-    uint64_t hcr_el2;
-
-    /* Don't take exceptions if they target a lower EL.
-     * This check should catch any exceptions that would not be taken but left
-     * pending.
-     */
-    if (cur_el > target_el) {
-        return false;
-    }
-
-    hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
-
-    switch (excp_idx) {
-    case EXCP_FIQ:
-        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
-        break;
-
-    case EXCP_IRQ:
-        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
-        break;
-
-    case EXCP_VFIQ:
-        if (secure || !(hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
-            /* VFIQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
-            return false;
-        }
-        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
-    case EXCP_VIRQ:
-        if (secure || !(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
-            /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
-            return false;
-        }
-        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
-    default:
-        g_assert_not_reached();
-    }
-
-    /* Use the target EL, current execution state and SCR/HCR settings to
-     * determine whether the corresponding CPSR bit is used to mask the
-     * interrupt.
-     */
-    if ((target_el > cur_el) && (target_el != 1)) {
-        /* Exceptions targeting a higher EL may not be maskable */
-        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
-            /* 64-bit masking rules are simple: exceptions to EL3
-             * can't be masked, and exceptions to EL2 can only be
-             * masked from Secure state. The HCR and SCR settings
-             * don't affect the masking logic, only the interrupt routing.
-             */
-            if (target_el == 3 || !secure) {
-                unmasked = 1;
-            }
-        } else {
-            /* The old 32-bit-only environment has a more complicated
-             * masking setup. HCR and SCR bits not only affect interrupt
-             * routing but also change the behaviour of masking.
-             */
-            bool hcr, scr;
-
-            switch (excp_idx) {
-            case EXCP_FIQ:
-                /* If FIQs are routed to EL3 or EL2 then there are cases where
-                 * we override the CPSR.F in determining if the exception is
-                 * masked or not. If neither of these are set then we fall back
-                 * to the CPSR.F setting otherwise we further assess the state
-                 * below.
-                 */
-                hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO;
-                scr = (env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_FIQ);
-
-                /* When EL3 is 32-bit, the SCR.FW bit controls whether the
-                 * CPSR.F bit masks FIQ interrupts when taken in non-secure
-                 * state. If SCR.FW is set then FIQs can be masked by CPSR.F
-                 * when non-secure but only when FIQs are only routed to EL3.
-                 */
-                scr = scr && !((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_FW) && !hcr);
-                break;
-            case EXCP_IRQ:
-                /* When EL3 execution state is 32-bit, if HCR.IMO is set then
-                 * we may override the CPSR.I masking when in non-secure state.
-                 * The SCR.IRQ setting has already been taken into consideration
-                 * when setting the target EL, so it does not have a further
-                 * affect here.
-                 */
-                hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO;
-                scr = false;
-                break;
-            default:
-                g_assert_not_reached();
-            }
-
-            if ((scr || hcr) && !secure) {
-                unmasked = 1;
-            }
-        }
-    }
-
-    /* The PSTATE bits only mask the interrupt if we have not overriden the
-     * ability above.
-     */
-    return unmasked || pstate_unmasked;
-}
-
 #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX "-" TYPE_ARM_CPU
 #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME(name) (name ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX)
 #define CPU_RESOLVING_TYPE TYPE_ARM_CPU
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 1ecf2adb6a..b81ed44bd2 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -410,6 +410,125 @@ static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *s)
     arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
 }
 
+static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx,
+                                     unsigned int target_el)
+{
+    CPUARMState *env = cs->env_ptr;
+    unsigned int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
+    bool secure = arm_is_secure(env);
+    bool pstate_unmasked;
+    int8_t unmasked = 0;
+    uint64_t hcr_el2;
+
+    /*
+     * Don't take exceptions if they target a lower EL.
+     * This check should catch any exceptions that would not be taken
+     * but left pending.
+     */
+    if (cur_el > target_el) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
+
+    switch (excp_idx) {
+    case EXCP_FIQ:
+        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
+        break;
+
+    case EXCP_IRQ:
+        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
+        break;
+
+    case EXCP_VFIQ:
+        if (secure || !(hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
+            /* VFIQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
+            return false;
+        }
+        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
+    case EXCP_VIRQ:
+        if (secure || !(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
+            /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized and non-secure.  */
+            return false;
+        }
+        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
+    default:
+        g_assert_not_reached();
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Use the target EL, current execution state and SCR/HCR settings to
+     * determine whether the corresponding CPSR bit is used to mask the
+     * interrupt.
+     */
+    if ((target_el > cur_el) && (target_el != 1)) {
+        /* Exceptions targeting a higher EL may not be maskable */
+        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
+            /*
+             * 64-bit masking rules are simple: exceptions to EL3
+             * can't be masked, and exceptions to EL2 can only be
+             * masked from Secure state. The HCR and SCR settings
+             * don't affect the masking logic, only the interrupt routing.
+             */
+            if (target_el == 3 || !secure) {
+                unmasked = 1;
+            }
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * The old 32-bit-only environment has a more complicated
+             * masking setup. HCR and SCR bits not only affect interrupt
+             * routing but also change the behaviour of masking.
+             */
+            bool hcr, scr;
+
+            switch (excp_idx) {
+            case EXCP_FIQ:
+                /*
+                 * If FIQs are routed to EL3 or EL2 then there are cases where
+                 * we override the CPSR.F in determining if the exception is
+                 * masked or not. If neither of these are set then we fall back
+                 * to the CPSR.F setting otherwise we further assess the state
+                 * below.
+                 */
+                hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO;
+                scr = (env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_FIQ);
+
+                /*
+                 * When EL3 is 32-bit, the SCR.FW bit controls whether the
+                 * CPSR.F bit masks FIQ interrupts when taken in non-secure
+                 * state. If SCR.FW is set then FIQs can be masked by CPSR.F
+                 * when non-secure but only when FIQs are only routed to EL3.
+                 */
+                scr = scr && !((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_FW) && !hcr);
+                break;
+            case EXCP_IRQ:
+                /*
+                 * When EL3 execution state is 32-bit, if HCR.IMO is set then
+                 * we may override the CPSR.I masking when in non-secure state.
+                 * The SCR.IRQ setting has already been taken into consideration
+                 * when setting the target EL, so it does not have a further
+                 * affect here.
+                 */
+                hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO;
+                scr = false;
+                break;
+            default:
+                g_assert_not_reached();
+            }
+
+            if ((scr || hcr) && !secure) {
+                unmasked = 1;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * The PSTATE bits only mask the interrupt if we have not overriden the
+     * ability above.
+     */
+    return unmasked || pstate_unmasked;
+}
+
 bool arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
 {
     CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cs);
-- 
2.20.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-06 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 10:54 [PATCH v7 00/41] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.1-VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 01/41] target/arm: Define isar_feature_aa64_vh Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 02/41] target/arm: Enable HCR_E2H for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/41] target/arm: Add CONTEXTIDR_EL2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/41] target/arm: Add TTBR1_EL2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/41] target/arm: Update CNTVCT_EL0 for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/41] target/arm: Split out vae1_tlbmask Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 07/41] target/arm: Split out alle1_tlbmask Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 08/41] target/arm: Simplify tlb_force_broadcast alternatives Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 09/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx*_S12NSE* to ARMMMUIdx*_E10_* Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 10/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx_S2NS to ARMMMUIdx_Stage2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 11/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx_S1NSE* to ARMMMUIdx_Stage1_E* Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx_S1SE[01] to ARMMMUIdx_SE10_[01] Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 13/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx*_S1E3 to ARMMMUIdx*_SE3 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 14/41] target/arm: Rename ARMMMUIdx_S1E2 to ARMMMUIdx_E2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 15/41] target/arm: Recover 4 bits from TBFLAGs Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 16/41] target/arm: Expand TBFLAG_ANY.MMUIDX to 4 bits Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 17/41] target/arm: Rearrange ARMMMUIdxBit Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 18/41] target/arm: Tidy ARMMMUIdx m-profile definitions Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 19/41] target/arm: Reorganize ARMMMUIdx Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 20/41] target/arm: Add regime_has_2_ranges Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 21/41] target/arm: Update arm_mmu_idx for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 22/41] target/arm: Update arm_sctlr " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 23/41] target/arm: Update aa64_zva_access for EL2 Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 24/41] target/arm: Update ctr_el0_access " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 25/41] target/arm: Add the hypervisor virtual counter Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 26/41] target/arm: Update timer access for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 27/41] target/arm: Update define_one_arm_cp_reg_with_opaque " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 28/41] target/arm: Add VHE system register redirection and aliasing Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 29/41] target/arm: Add VHE timer " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 30/41] target/arm: Flush tlb for ASID changes in EL2&0 translation regime Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 31/41] target/arm: Flush tlbs for E2&0 " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 32/41] target/arm: Update arm_phys_excp_target_el for TGE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 33/41] target/arm: Update {fp,sve}_exception_el for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 34/41] target/arm: check TGE and E2H flags for EL0 pauth traps Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 35/41] target/arm: Update get_a64_user_mem_index for VHE Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 36/41] target/arm: Update arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64 " Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 37/41] target/arm: Enable ARMv8.1-VHE in -cpu max Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 39/41] target/arm: Pass more cpu state to arm_excp_unmasked Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 40/41] target/arm: Use bool for unmasked in arm_excp_unmasked Richard Henderson
2020-02-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v7 41/41] target/arm: Raise only one interrupt in arm_cpu_exec_interrupt Richard Henderson
2020-02-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v7 00/41] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.1-VHE Peter Maydell
2020-03-31 15:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-31 17:29     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-03-31 18:59     ` Richard Henderson
2020-04-01 10:45       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-01 16:01         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200206105448.4726-39-richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).